GLM-4.5V vs Morph V3 Fast vs Pixtral Large (25.02)
GLM-4.5V comes out ahead, 48 to 33 and 32 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5V
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $1.80
- Context64K
Morph
Morph V3 Fast
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $1.20
- Context262K
Mistral AIPixtral Large (25.02)
33/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context128K
GLM-4.5V is our pick
GLM-4.5V is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on inputs & features. Morph V3 Fast wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-4.5V and Morph V3 FastGLM-4.5V $0.90 · Morph V3 Fast $0.90 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast 262,144 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGLM-4.5VGLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video · Morph V3 Fast: Text · Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images
- Self-hostingGLM-4.5VPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GLM-4.5V | Morph V3 Fast | Pixtral Large (25.02) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 50 | 50 | 26 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 0 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 12 | 37 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 48/100 | 32/100 | 33/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu) | Morph V3 FastMorph | Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 (best) | $0.80 | $2.00 |
| Output | $1.80 | $1.20 (best) | $6.00 |
| Cached input | $0.11 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.90 (best) | $0.90 (best) | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Z.AI API | Median of 5 providers | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 64,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | glm-4.5v | — | — |
| API providers | 17 (best) | 5 | 3 |
| Released | Aug 11, 2025 | Jul 7, 2025 | Apr 8, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GLM-4.5V$9.60
- Morph V3 Fast$10.40
- Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GLM-4.5V, Morph V3 Fast or Pixtral Large (25.02)?
GLM-4.5V is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on inputs & features. Morph V3 Fast wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V, Morph V3 Fast or Pixtral Large (25.02)?
GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Morph V3 Fast costs $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for GLM-4.5V versus $0.90 for Morph V3 Fast (1× as much) and $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (3.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet, Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet and Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.5V, Morph V3 Fast and Pixtral Large (25.02) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Morph V3 Fast does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Morph V3 Fast has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02) and 64,000 for GLM-4.5V. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.5V up to 16,384, Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072, Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video; Morph V3 Fast accepts text; Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images. GLM-4.5V handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-4.5V publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Morph V3 Fast and Pixtral Large (25.02) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.5V is the newest, released Aug 11, 2025. Morph V3 Fast came out Jul 7, 2025; Pixtral Large (25.02) came out Apr 8, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5V Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
