GLM-4.5-Flash vs Nova 2 Pro vs PaddleOCR VL
Nova 2 Pro comes out ahead, 86 to 65 and 62 on our weighted score.
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5-Flash
65/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context131K
- Our pick
AmazonNova 2 Pro
86/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context1M
PaddlePaddle
PaddleOCR VL
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.02 / $0.02
- Context131K
Nova 2 Pro is our pick
Nova 2 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 86/100 against GLM-4.5-Flash (65) and PaddleOCR VL (62). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-4.5-Flash and Nova 2 ProGLM-4.5-Flash Free · Nova 2 Pro Free · PaddleOCR VL $0.02 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova 2 ProNova 2 Pro 1,000,000 · GLM-4.5-Flash 131,072 · PaddleOCR VL 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsNova 2 ProGLM-4.5-Flash: Text · Nova 2 Pro: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · PaddleOCR VL: Text, Images
- Self-hostingPaddleOCR VLPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | GLM-4.5-Flash | Nova 2 Pro | PaddleOCR VL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 60 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 86/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GLM-4.5-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) | Nova 2 ProAmazon | PaddleOCR VLPaddlePaddle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | Free (best) | Free (best) | $0.02 |
| Output | Free (best) | Free (best) | $0.02 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | Free (best) | Free (best) | $0.02 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Z.AI API | Official Nova API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 98,304 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | glm-4.5-flash | nova-2-pro-v1 | — |
| API providers | 5 (best) | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Jul 28, 2025 | Dec 3, 2025 | Oct 16, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GLM-4.5-FlashFree
- Nova 2 ProFree
- PaddleOCR VL$0.24
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GLM-4.5-Flash, Nova 2 Pro or PaddleOCR VL?
Nova 2 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 86/100 against GLM-4.5-Flash (65) and PaddleOCR VL (62). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Flash, Nova 2 Pro or PaddleOCR VL?
GLM-4.5-Flash is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Nova 2 Pro costs Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Nova API price); PaddleOCR VL costs $0.02 input / $0.02 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). GLM-4.5-Flash is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GLM-4.5-Flash has not been scored yet, Nova 2 Pro has not been scored yet and PaddleOCR VL has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.5-Flash, Nova 2 Pro and PaddleOCR VL yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that PaddleOCR VL does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Pro has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for GLM-4.5-Flash and 131,072 for PaddleOCR VL. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.5-Flash up to 98,304, Nova 2 Pro up to 64,000, PaddleOCR VL up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GLM-4.5-Flash accepts text; Nova 2 Pro accepts text, images, PDFs and video; PaddleOCR VL accepts text and images. Nova 2 Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
PaddleOCR VL publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; GLM-4.5-Flash and Nova 2 Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nova 2 Pro is the newest, released Dec 3, 2025. PaddleOCR VL came out Oct 16, 2025; GLM-4.5-Flash came out Jul 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5-Flash Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
