ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT vs MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen3-VL Plus

Qwen3-VL Plus comes out ahead, 56 to 48 and 39 on our weighted score, though Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT is 27% cheaper per token.

  1. AI Singapore

    Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    39/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.351 / $0.555
    • Context128K
  2. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2

    Released Oct 27, 2025

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $1.20
    • Context205K
  3. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-VL Plus

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    56/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.60
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Qwen3-VL Plus is our pick

Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against MiniMax-M2 (48) and Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT (39). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT $0.402 · MiniMax-M2 $0.525 · Qwen3-VL Plus $0.55 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-VL PlusQwen3-VL Plus 262,144 · MiniMax-M2 204,800 · Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3-VL PlusGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT: Text · MiniMax-M2: Text · Qwen3-VL Plus: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT and MiniMax-M2Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITMiniMax-M2Qwen3-VL Plus
Price50%696362
Inputs & features30%03560
Context window20%243237
Overall100%39/10048/10056/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT vs MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen3-VL Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITAI SingaporeMiniMax-M2MiniMaxQwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.351$0.30$0.20 (best)
Output$0.555 (best)$1.20$1.60
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.402 (best)$0.525$0.55
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens204,800 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesYes
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model ID—MiniMax-M2qwen3-vl-plus
API providers213 (best)6
ReleasedSep 23, 2025Oct 27, 2025Sep 23, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT$4.62
  • MiniMax-M2$5.40
  • Qwen3-VL Plus$5.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT, MiniMax-M2 or Qwen3-VL Plus?

Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against MiniMax-M2 (48) and Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT (39). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT, MiniMax-M2 or Qwen3-VL Plus?

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT is cheaper at $0.351 input / $0.555 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). MiniMax-M2 costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price); Qwen3-VL Plus costs $0.20 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.402 per million tokens for Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT versus $0.525 for MiniMax-M2 (1.3× as much) and $0.55 for Qwen3-VL Plus (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT has not been scored yet, MiniMax-M2 has not been scored yet and Qwen3-VL Plus has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT, MiniMax-M2 and Qwen3-VL Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-VL Plus has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2 and 128,000 for Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT up to 128,000, MiniMax-M2 up to 131,072, Qwen3-VL Plus up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT accepts text; MiniMax-M2 accepts text; Qwen3-VL Plus accepts text and images. Qwen3-VL Plus handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT and MiniMax-M2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3-VL Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

MiniMax-M2 is the newest, released Oct 27, 2025. Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT came out Sep 23, 2025; Qwen3-VL Plus came out Sep 23, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-VL Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.