ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemma 4 12B IT vs Seed Character vs Laguna S 2.1

Too close to call on our weighted score (Seed Character 75, Gemma 4 12B IT 75, Laguna S 2.1 69). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Google

    Gemma 4 12B IT

    Released Jun 9, 2026

    75/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.075 / $0.275
    • Context262K
  2. ByteDance Seed

    Seed Character

    Released Jun 23, 2026

    75/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.119 / $0.297
    • Context256K
  3. Poolside

    Laguna S 2.1

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.20
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Seed Character 75/100, Gemma 4 12B IT 75/100, Laguna S 2.1 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemma 4 12B IT on price and Laguna S 2.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemma 4 12B IT and Laguna S 2.1Gemma 4 12B IT $0.125 · Laguna S 2.1 $0.125 · Seed Character $0.163 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 1,048,576 · Gemma 4 12B IT 262,144 · Seed Character 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed CharacterGemma 4 12B IT: Text, Images · Seed Character: Text, Images, Video · Laguna S 2.1: Text
  • Self-hostingGemma 4 12B IT and Laguna S 2.1Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 4 12B ITSeed CharacterLaguna S 2.1
Price50%938793
Inputs & features30%708035
Context window20%373661
Overall100%75/10075/10069/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 4 12B IT vs Seed Character vs Laguna S 2.1 specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 4 12B ITGoogleSeed CharacterByteDance SeedLaguna S 2.1Poolside
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.075 (best)$0.119$0.10
Output$0.275$0.297$0.20 (best)
Cached input—$0.024—
Blended (3:1)$0.125 (best)$0.163$0.125 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 32K: $0.178 / $0.891Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersOfficial Volcengine Ark APIMedian of 4 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens256,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output32,768 tokens256,000 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYesYesminimal · low · highYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model ID—doubao-seed-character-260628poolside/laguna-s-2.1
API providers226 (best)
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jun 23, 2026Jul 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 4 12B IT$1.30
  • Seed Character$1.78
  • Laguna S 2.1$1.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 4 12B IT, Seed Character or Laguna S 2.1?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Seed Character 75/100, Gemma 4 12B IT 75/100, Laguna S 2.1 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemma 4 12B IT on price and Laguna S 2.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 12B IT, Seed Character or Laguna S 2.1?

Gemma 4 12B IT is cheaper at $0.075 input / $0.275 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Laguna S 2.1 costs $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Poolside); Seed Character costs $0.119 input / $0.297 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Gemma 4 12B IT versus $0.125 for Laguna S 2.1 (1× as much) and $0.163 for Seed Character (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemma 4 12B IT has not been scored yet, Seed Character has not been scored yet and Laguna S 2.1 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 4 12B IT, Seed Character and Laguna S 2.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna S 2.1 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Gemma 4 12B IT and 256,000 for Seed Character. Maximum output per response: Gemma 4 12B IT up to 32,768, Seed Character up to 256,000, Laguna S 2.1 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 4 12B IT accepts text and images; Seed Character accepts text, images and video; Laguna S 2.1 accepts text. Seed Character handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma 4 12B IT and Laguna S 2.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed Character is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Laguna S 2.1 is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. Seed Character came out Jun 23, 2026; Gemma 4 12B IT came out Jun 9, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.