ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Seed Character vs Laguna S 2.1

Seed Character comes out ahead, 75 to 69 on our weighted score, though Laguna S 2.1 is 23% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    ByteDance Seed

    Seed Character

    Released Jun 23, 2026

    75/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.119 / $0.297
    • Context256K
  2. Poolside

    Laguna S 2.1

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.20
    • Context1.05M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Seed Character is our pick

Seed Character is the better all-round choice, scoring 75/100 against Laguna S 2.1 (69). It leads on inputs & features. Laguna S 2.1 wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 $0.125 · Seed Character $0.163 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 1,048,576 · Seed Character 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed CharacterSeed Character: Text, Images, Video · Laguna S 2.1: Text
  • Self-hostingLaguna S 2.1Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightSeed CharacterLaguna S 2.1
Price50%8793
Inputs & features30%8035
Context window20%3661
Overall100%75/10069/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Seed Character vs Laguna S 2.1 specifications side by side
SpecificationSeed CharacterByteDance SeedLaguna S 2.1Poolside
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.119$0.10 (best)
Output$0.297$0.20 (best)
Cached input$0.024—
Blended (3:1)$0.163$0.125 (best)
Long-context rateOver 32K: $0.178 / $0.891Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Volcengine Ark APIMedian of 4 providers
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output256,000 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · highYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model IDdoubao-seed-character-260628poolside/laguna-s-2.1
API providers26 (best)
ReleasedJun 23, 2026Jul 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Seed Character$1.78
  • Laguna S 2.1$1.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Seed Character or Laguna S 2.1?

Seed Character is the better all-round choice, scoring 75/100 against Laguna S 2.1 (69). It leads on inputs & features. Laguna S 2.1 wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Seed Character or Laguna S 2.1?

Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Poolside). Seed Character costs $0.119 input / $0.297 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Laguna S 2.1 versus $0.163 for Seed Character (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Seed Character has not been scored yet and Laguna S 2.1 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed Character and Laguna S 2.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna S 2.1 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed Character. Maximum output per response: Seed Character up to 256,000, Laguna S 2.1 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Seed Character accepts text, images and video; Laguna S 2.1 accepts text. Seed Character handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Laguna S 2.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed Character is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Laguna S 2.1 is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. Seed Character came out Jun 23, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.