Gemma 3n E4B IT vs ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B comes out ahead, 25 to 21 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
GoogleGemma 3n E4B IT
21/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context33K
- Our pick
BaiduERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
25/100- ECI—
- Price$0.07 / $0.28
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is our pick
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 25/100 against Gemma 3n E4B IT (21). It leads on context window. Gemma 3n E4B IT wins on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceERNIE 4.5 21B A3BERNIE 4.5 21B A3B $0.122 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Gemma 3n E4B IT unpriced
- Longest contextERNIE 4.5 21B A3BERNIE 4.5 21B A3B 131,072 · Gemma 3n E4B IT 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsGemma 3n E4B ITGemma 3n E4B IT: Text, Images, Audio · ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 3n E4B IT | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 35 | 25 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 21/100 | 25/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemma 3n E4B ITGoogle | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3BBaidu |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $0.07 |
| Output | — | $0.28 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.122 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens (best) | 8,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenGemma Terms of Use | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | — | 1 |
| Released | Jun 26, 2025 | Jun 30, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemma 3n E4B IT—
- ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B$1.26
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 3n E4B IT or ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 25/100 against Gemma 3n E4B IT (21). It leads on context window. Gemma 3n E4B IT wins on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4B IT or ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is cheaper at $0.07 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.122 per million tokens for ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B versus . Gemma 3n E4B IT has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemma 3n E4B IT has not been scored yet and ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3n E4B IT and ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Gemma 3n E4B IT does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 32,768 for Gemma 3n E4B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3n E4B IT up to 32,768, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B up to 8,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 3n E4B IT accepts text, images and audio; ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B accepts text. Gemma 3n E4B IT handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Gemma Terms of Use and Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is the newest, released Jun 30, 2025. Gemma 3n E4B IT came out Jun 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3n E4B IT Jun 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add o3-deep-researchThree-way comparison
- Gemma 3n E4B IT vs o3-deep-researchOpenAI
- Gemma 3n E4B IT vs Mistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AI
- Gemma 3n E4B IT vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B vs Qwen FlashAlibaba (Qwen)
- ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B vs Apertus 8BSwiss AI
- ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B vs Mistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AI
