ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemma 3n E2B IT vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 comes out ahead, 27 to 21 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Google

    Gemma 3n E2B IT

    Released Jun 26, 2025

    21/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context33K
    Full specs Remove Gemma 3n E2B IT
  2. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Voxtral Small 24B 2507

    Released Jul 15, 2025

    27/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.40
    • Context33K
    Full specs Remove Voxtral Small 24B 2507

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is our pick

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 27/100 against Gemma 3n E2B IT (21). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceVoxtral Small 24B 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Gemma 3n E2B IT unpriced
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGemma 3n E2B IT 32,768 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma 3n E2B ITGemma 3n E2B IT: Text, Images, Audio · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 3n E2B ITVoxtral Small 24B 2507
Inputs & features60%3545
Context window40%00
Overall100%21/10027/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 3n E2B IT vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 3n E2B ITGoogleVoxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input—$0.10
Output—$0.40
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)—$0.175
Long-context rate—Same rate
Price source—Official Mistral API
Limits
Context window32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioYesYes
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenGemma Terms of UseOpenApache 2.0
API model ID—voxtral-small-latest
API providers—10
ReleasedJun 26, 2025Jul 15, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJun 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 3n E2B IT—
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 3n E2B IT or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 27/100 against Gemma 3n E2B IT (21). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E2B IT or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 versus . Gemma 3n E2B IT has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemma 3n E2B IT has not been scored yet and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3n E2B IT and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Gemma 3n E2B IT does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 3n E2B IT and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 share the same 32,768-token context window. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3n E2B IT up to 32,768, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 3n E2B IT accepts text, images and audio; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio. Gemma 3n E2B IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights (Gemma Terms of Use and Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the newest, released Jul 15, 2025. Gemma 3n E2B IT came out Jun 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3n E2B IT Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons