ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemma 3 4B IT vs Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3

Gemma 3 4B IT comes out ahead, 36 to 32 and 22 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemma 3 4B IT

    Released Mar 12, 2025

    36/100
    • ECI115.8
    • Price$0.05 / $0.10
    • Context131K
  2. Meta

    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    32/100
    • ECI116.4
    • Price$0.06 / $0.08
    • Context128K
  3. Mistral AI

    Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3

    Released May 22, 2024

    22/100
    • ECI109.0
    • Price—
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

Gemma 3 4B IT is our pick

Gemma 3 4B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 36/100 against Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (32) and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 (22). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

  • CapabilityLlama-3.1-8B-InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 116.4 · Gemma 3 4B IT 115.8 · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 109.0
  • Lowest priceGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT $0.063 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.065 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 unpriced
  • Longest contextGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT 131,072 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT: Text, Images · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 3 4B ITLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMistral 7B Instruct v0.3
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)67%343526
Inputs & features20%502525
Context window13%25240
Overall100%36/10032/10022/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 3 4B IT vs Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 3 4B ITGoogleLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMetaMistral 7B Instruct v0.3Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)115.8116.4 (best)109.0
ECI rank#163 of 165#162 of 165 (best)#164 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions23.2%27.0% (best)15.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics7.5% (best)1.7%0.3%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.05 (best)$0.06—
Output$0.10$0.08 (best)—
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.063 (best)$0.065—
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate—
Price sourceMedian of 9 providersMedian of 17 providers—
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)4,096 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpenApache 2.0
API model ID———
API providers1018 (best)1
ReleasedMar 12, 2025Jul 23, 2024May 22, 2024
Knowledge cutoffAug 2024Dec 2023—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 3 4B IT$0.70
  • Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$0.76
  • Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3—
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 3 4B IT, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct or Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3?

Gemma 3 4B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 36/100 against Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (32) and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 (22). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B IT, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct or Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3?

Gemma 3 4B IT is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct costs $0.06 input / $0.08 output per million tokens (median across 17 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.063 per million tokens for Gemma 3 4B IT versus $0.065 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (1× as much). Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 116.4 (#162 of 165), Gemma 3 4B IT 115.8 (#163 of 165) and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 109.0 (#164 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (107.0–121.6 vs 97.9–123.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%, Gemma 3 4B IT 23.2%, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 15.2%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemma 3 4B IT 7.5%, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 1.7%, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 0.3%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 4B IT, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 3 4B IT has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and 32,768 for Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 4B IT up to 131,072, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 3 4B IT accepts text and images; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 accepts text. Gemma 3 4B IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Gemma 3 4B IT is the newest, released Mar 12, 2025. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024; Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 came out May 22, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 4B IT Aug 2024, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.