Gemma 3 27B IT vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507
Too close to call on our weighted score (Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 61, Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 59, Gemma 3 27B IT 57). The right pick depends on what you value most.
GoogleGemma 3 27B IT
57/100- ECI129.9
- Price$0.11 / $0.30
- Context131K
MetaLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
61/100- ECI129.6
- Price$0.17 / $0.59
- Context10M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507
59/100- ECI137.3
- Price$0.10 / $0.30
- Context262K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 61/100, Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 59/100, Gemma 3 27B IT 57/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 for raw capability and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 137.3 · Gemma 3 27B IT 129.9 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.6
- Lowest priceQwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 $0.15 · Gemma 3 27B IT $0.157 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 262,144 · Gemma 3 27B IT 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGemma 3 27B IT and Llama 4 Scout 17B InstructGemma 3 27B IT: Text, Images · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images · Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 3 27B IT | Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct | Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 52 | 51 | 61 |
| Price | 25% | 84 | 73 | 85 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 50 | 50 | 25 |
| Context window | 10% | 25 | 100 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 61/100 | 59/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemma 3 27B ITGoogle | Llama 4 Scout 17B InstructMeta | Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507Alibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 129.9 | 129.6 | 137.3 (best) |
| ECI rank | #137 of 165 | #138 of 165 | #124 of 165 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 47.7% | 51.8% | 55.6% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 22.5% | 7.8% | 62.2% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.11 | $0.17 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.30 (best) | $0.59 | $0.30 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.157 | $0.275 | $0.15 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 16 providers | Median of 13 providers | Median of 12 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 17 (best) | 13 | 14 |
| Released | Mar 12, 2025 | Apr 5, 2025 | Jul 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemma 3 27B IT$1.69
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$2.88
- Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507$1.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 3 27B IT, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 61/100, Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 59/100, Gemma 3 27B IT 57/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 for raw capability and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B IT, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507?
Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers). Gemma 3 27B IT costs $0.11 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers); Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct costs $0.17 input / $0.59 output per million tokens (median across 13 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 versus $0.157 for Gemma 3 27B IT (1× as much) and $0.275 for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (1.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 137.3 (#124 of 165), Gemma 3 27B IT 129.9 (#137 of 165) and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.6 (#138 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (131.7–139.4 vs 124.2–132.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 55.6%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%, Gemma 3 27B IT 47.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 62.2%, Gemma 3 27B IT 22.5%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 27B IT, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct and Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 and 131,072 for Gemma 3 27B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 27B IT up to 131,072, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384, Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 3 27B IT accepts text and images; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images; Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 accepts text. Gemma 3 27B IT handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 is the newest, released Jul 28, 2025. Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct came out Apr 5, 2025; Gemma 3 27B IT came out Mar 12, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 27B IT Aug 2024, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Gemma 3 27B IT vs Mistral Small 3Mistral AI
- Gemma 3 27B IT vs Qwen3 30B A3BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 136.2
- Gemma 3 27B IT vs GLM-4.7-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI · ECI 127.5
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek · ECI 132.3
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs GPT-4o miniOpenAI · ECI 126.5
