ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemma 3 27B IT vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Ministral 3 8B

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 72 to 68 and 62 on our weighted score, though Ministral 3 8B is 45% cheaper per token.

  1. Google

    Gemma 3 27B IT

    Released Mar 12, 2025

    62/100
    • ECI129.9
    • Price$0.11 / $0.30
    • Context131K
  2. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    72/100
    • ECI129.6
    • Price$0.17 / $0.59
    • Context10M
  3. Mistral AI

    Ministral 3 8B

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is our pick

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Ministral 3 8B (68) and Gemma 3 27B IT (62). It leads on context window. Ministral 3 8B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMinistral 3 8BMinistral 3 8B $0.15 · Gemma 3 27B IT $0.157 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · Ministral 3 8B 262,144 · Gemma 3 27B IT 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsGemma 3 27B IT: Text, Images · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images · Ministral 3 8B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 3 27B ITLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructMinistral 3 8B
Price50%847385
Inputs & features30%505060
Context window20%2510037
Overall100%62/10072/10068/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 3 27B IT vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Ministral 3 8B specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 3 27B ITGoogleLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructMetaMinistral 3 8BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)129.9 (best)129.6—
ECI rank#137 of 165 (best)#138 of 165—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions47.7%51.8% (best)—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics22.5% (best)7.8%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.11 (best)$0.17$0.15
Output$0.30$0.59$0.15 (best)
Cached input——$0.015
Blended (3:1)$0.157$0.275$0.15 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 16 providersMedian of 13 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens10,000,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens16,384 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpenApache 2.0
API model ID——ministral-8b-2512
API providers17 (best)1311
ReleasedMar 12, 2025Apr 5, 2025Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoffAug 2024Aug 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 3 27B IT$1.69
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$2.88
  • Ministral 3 8B$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 3 27B IT, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Ministral 3 8B?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Ministral 3 8B (68) and Gemma 3 27B IT (62). It leads on context window. Ministral 3 8B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B IT, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Ministral 3 8B?

Ministral 3 8B is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Gemma 3 27B IT costs $0.11 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers); Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct costs $0.17 input / $0.59 output per million tokens (median across 13 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Ministral 3 8B versus $0.157 for Gemma 3 27B IT (1× as much) and $0.275 for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (1.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemma 3 27B IT has an ECI of 129.9, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has an ECI of 129.6 and Ministral 3 8B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 27B IT, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct and Ministral 3 8B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Ministral 3 8B and 131,072 for Gemma 3 27B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 27B IT up to 131,072, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384, Ministral 3 8B up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 3 27B IT accepts text and images; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images; Ministral 3 8B accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Ministral 3 8B is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct came out Apr 5, 2025; Gemma 3 27B IT came out Mar 12, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 27B IT Aug 2024, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.