Gemma 3 12B IT vs GPT-4o mini vs Qwen Turbo
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemma 3 12B IT 49, Qwen Turbo 48, GPT-4o mini 43). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Google
Gemma 3 12B IT
49/100- ECI123.5
- Price$0.05 / $0.15
- Context131K
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
43/100- ECI126.6
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context128K
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen Turbo
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.05 / $0.20
- Context1M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemma 3 12B IT 49/100, Qwen Turbo 48/100, GPT-4o mini 43/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemma 3 12B IT for raw capability and Qwen Turbo for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.
- CapabilityGemma 3 12B ITShared benchmarks: Gemma 3 12B IT 28.1% · Qwen Turbo 24.0% · GPT-4o mini 22.3%
- Lowest priceGemma 3 12B ITGemma 3 12B IT $0.075 · Qwen Turbo $0.087 · GPT-4o mini $0.263 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen TurboQwen Turbo 1,000,000 · Gemma 3 12B IT 131,072 · GPT-4o mini 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4o miniGemma 3 12B IT: Text, Images · GPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen Turbo: Text
- Self-hostingGemma 3 12B ITPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 3 12B IT | GPT-4o mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityShared benchmarks | 50% | 28 | 22 | 24 |
| Price | 25% | 100 | 77 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 50 | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 24 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 49/100 | 43/100 | 48/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 123.5 | 126.6 (best) | — |
| ECI rank | #138 of 148 | #135 of 148 (best) | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 39.5% | 37.7% | 41.8% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 0.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 16.7% (best) | 6.9% | 6.1% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 8.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.05 (best) | $0.15 | $0.05 (best) |
| Output | $0.15 (best) | $0.60 | $0.20 |
| Cached input | — | $0.075 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.075 (best) | $0.263 | $0.087 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 7 providers | Official OpenAI API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | gpt-4o-mini | qwen-turbo |
| API providers | 7 | 21 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Mar 12, 2025 | Jul 18, 2024 | Nov 1, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2024 | Sep 2023 | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Gemma 3 12B IT$0.80
GPT-4o mini$2.70
Qwen Turbo$0.90
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 3 12B IT, GPT-4o mini or Qwen Turbo?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemma 3 12B IT 49/100, Qwen Turbo 48/100, GPT-4o mini 43/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemma 3 12B IT for raw capability and Qwen Turbo for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B IT, GPT-4o mini or Qwen Turbo?
Gemma 3 12B IT is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 7 API providers). Qwen Turbo costs $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); GPT-4o mini costs $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.075 per million tokens for Gemma 3 12B IT versus $0.087 for Qwen Turbo (1.2× as much) and $0.263 for GPT-4o mini (3.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025): Gemma 3 12B IT 28.1%, Qwen Turbo 24.0% and GPT-4o mini 22.3%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen Turbo 41.8%, Gemma 3 12B IT 39.5%, GPT-4o mini 37.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemma 3 12B IT 16.7%, GPT-4o mini 6.9%, Qwen Turbo 6.1%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 12B IT, GPT-4o mini and Qwen Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemma 3 12B IT leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemma 3 12B IT and 128,000 for GPT-4o mini. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 12B IT up to 131,072, GPT-4o mini up to 16,384, Qwen Turbo up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 3 12B IT accepts text and images; GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen Turbo accepts text. GPT-4o mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Gemma 3 12B IT publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o mini and Qwen Turbo is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemma 3 12B IT is the newest, released Mar 12, 2025. Qwen Turbo came out Nov 1, 2024; GPT-4o mini came out Jul 18, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 12B IT Aug 2024, GPT-4o mini Sep 2023, Qwen Turbo Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.