Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Large 2.1 vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Large 2.1 38, Gemma 2 27B 35, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 34). The right pick depends on what you value most.
GoogleGemma 2 27B
35/100- ECI122.1
- Price$0.65 / $0.65
- Context8K
Mistral AIMistral Large 2.1
38/100- ECI128.6
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context131K
- Mistral AI
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
34/100- ECI122.0
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context66K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Mistral Large 2.1 38/100, Gemma 2 27B 35/100, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 34/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Large 2.1 for raw capability and Gemma 2 27B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityMistral Large 2.1Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Large 2.1 128.6 · Gemma 2 27B 122.1 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0
- Lowest priceGemma 2 27BGemma 2 27B $0.65 · Mistral Large 2.1 $3.00 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMistral Large 2.1Mistral Large 2.1 131,072 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 65,536 · Gemma 2 27B 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsMixtral 8x22B InstructGemma 2 27B: Text · Mistral Large 2.1: Text · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct: Text, PDFs
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Large 2.1 | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 42 | 50 | 42 |
| Price | 25% | 56 | 26 | 26 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 0 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 0 | 25 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 35/100 | 38/100 | 34/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemma 2 27BGoogle | Mistral Large 2.1Mistral AI | Mixtral 8x22B InstructMistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 122.1 | 128.6 (best) | 122.0 |
| ECI rank | #152 of 165 | #142 of 165 (best) | #155 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 36.5% | 51.3% (best) | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 1.4% | 7.8% (best) | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.65 (best) | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $0.65 (best) | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.65 (best) | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Median of 2 providers | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Max output | 2,048 tokens | 16,384 tokens | 52,428 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 3 | 2 | 5 (best) |
| Released | Jul 13, 2024 | Nov 18, 2024 | Apr 17, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 30, 2024 | Nov 2024 | Jan 31, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemma 2 27B$7.80
- Mistral Large 2.1$32.00
- Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 2 27B, Mistral Large 2.1 or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Mistral Large 2.1 38/100, Gemma 2 27B 35/100, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 34/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Large 2.1 for raw capability and Gemma 2 27B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B, Mistral Large 2.1 or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?
Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Mistral Large 2.1 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.65 per million tokens for Gemma 2 27B versus $3.00 for Mistral Large 2.1 (4.6× as much) and $3.00 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (4.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Mistral Large 2.1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Large 2.1 128.6 (#142 of 165), Gemma 2 27B 122.1 (#152 of 165) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0 (#155 of 165). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (124.3–130.7 vs 115.8–124.1), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Large 2.1 51.3%, Gemma 2 27B 36.5%, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 34.1%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 2 27B, Mistral Large 2.1 and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Large 2.1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Note that Gemma 2 27B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 2.1 has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 65,536 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and 8,192 for Gemma 2 27B. Maximum output per response: Gemma 2 27B up to 2,048, Mistral Large 2.1 up to 16,384, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct up to 52,428 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 2 27B accepts text; Mistral Large 2.1 accepts text; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct accepts text and PDFs. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Mistral Large 2.1 is the newest, released Nov 18, 2024. Gemma 2 27B came out Jul 13, 2024; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct came out Apr 17, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 2 27B Jun 30, 2024, Mistral Large 2.1 Nov 2024, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct Jan 31, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral LargeMistral AI · ECI 122.0
- Gemma 2 27B vs Llama-3.1-70B-InstructMeta · ECI 125.9
- Gemma 2 27B vs Claude Haiku 3Anthropic · ECI 118.8
- Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4o miniOpenAI · ECI 126.5
- Mistral Large 2.1 vs Claude Haiku 3.5Anthropic · ECI 127.0
- Mistral Large 2.1 vs GPT-4oOpenAI · ECI 129.0
