ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct comes out ahead, 37 to 28 and 22 on our weighted score, though Gemma 2 27B is 4.6× cheaper per token.

  1. Google

    Gemma 2 27B

    Released Jul 13, 2024

    28/100
    • ECI122.1
    • Price$0.65 / $0.65
    • Context8K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3

    Released May 22, 2024

    22/100
    • ECI109.0
    • Price—
    • Context33K
  3. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

    Released Apr 17, 2024

    37/100
    • ECI122.0
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context66K
01 — Verdict

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is our pick

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 37/100 against Gemma 2 27B (28) and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 (22). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

  • CapabilityGemma 2 27BCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 2 27B 122.1 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0 · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 109.0
  • Lowest priceGemma 2 27BGemma 2 27B $0.65 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 unpriced
  • Longest contextMixtral 8x22B InstructMixtral 8x22B Instruct 65,536 · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 32,768 · Gemma 2 27B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsMixtral 8x22B InstructGemma 2 27B: Text · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3: Text · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct: Text, PDFs
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 2 27BMistral 7B Instruct v0.3Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)67%422642
Inputs & features20%02535
Context window13%0012
Overall100%28/10022/10037/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 2 27BGoogleMistral 7B Instruct v0.3Mistral AIMixtral 8x22B InstructMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)122.1 (best)109.0122.0
ECI rank#152 of 165 (best)#164 of 165#155 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions36.5% (best)15.2%34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.4% (best)0.3%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.65 (best)—$2.00
Output$0.65 (best)—$6.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.65 (best)—$3.00
Long-context rateSame rate—Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 3 providers—Median of 5 providers
Limits
Context window8,192 tokens32,768 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Max output2,048 tokens32,768 tokens52,428 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenApache 2.0Open
API model ID———
API providers315 (best)
ReleasedJul 13, 2024May 22, 2024Apr 17, 2024
Knowledge cutoffJun 30, 2024—Jan 31, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 2 27B$7.80
  • Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3—
  • Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 2 27B, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 37/100 against Gemma 2 27B (28) and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 (22). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.65 per million tokens for Gemma 2 27B versus $3.00 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (4.6× as much). Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 2 27B 122.1 (#152 of 165), Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0 (#155 of 165) and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 109.0 (#164 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (115.8–124.1 vs 115.7–124.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemma 2 27B 36.5%, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 34.1%, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 15.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 2 27B, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemma 2 27B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Note that Gemma 2 27B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct has the largest context window at 65,536 tokens, against 32,768 for Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 and 8,192 for Gemma 2 27B. Maximum output per response: Gemma 2 27B up to 2,048, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 up to 32,768, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct up to 52,428 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 2 27B accepts text; Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 accepts text; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct accepts text and PDFs. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Gemma 2 27B is the newest, released Jul 13, 2024. Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 came out May 22, 2024; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct came out Apr 17, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 2 27B Jun 30, 2024, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct Jan 31, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.