ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemma 2 27B vs Aya Expanse 32B vs Mistral Large

Mistral Large comes out ahead, 45 to 32 and 28 on our weighted score, though Gemma 2 27B is 13% cheaper per token.

  1. Google

    Gemma 2 27B

    Released Jul 13, 2024

    28/100
    • ECI122.1
    • Price$0.65 / $0.65
    • Context8K
  2. Cohere

    Aya Expanse 32B

    Released Oct 24, 2024

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
  3. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Mistral Large

    Released Feb 26, 2024

    45/100
    • ECI122.0
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Mistral Large is our pick

Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32) and Gemma 2 27B (28). It leads on inputs & features. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemma 2 27BGemma 2 27B $0.65 · Aya Expanse 32B $0.75 · Mistral Large $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAya Expanse 32B and Mistral LargeAya Expanse 32B 128,000 · Mistral Large 128,000 · Gemma 2 27B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsMistral LargeGemma 2 27B: Text · Aya Expanse 32B: Text · Mistral Large: Text, PDFs
  • Self-hostingGemma 2 27B and Aya Expanse 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 2 27BAya Expanse 32BMistral Large
Price50%565353
Inputs & features30%0045
Context window20%02424
Overall100%28/10032/10045/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 2 27B vs Aya Expanse 32B vs Mistral Large specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 2 27BGoogleAya Expanse 32BCohereMistral LargeMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)122.1 (best)—122.0
ECI rank#152 of 165 (best)—#153 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions36.5%—38.8% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.4%—1.9% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.65$0.50 (best)$0.50 (best)
Output$0.65 (best)$1.50$1.50
Cached input——$0.05
Blended (3:1)$0.65 (best)$0.75$0.75
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 3 providersOfficial Cohere APIOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window8,192 tokens128,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens (best)
Max output2,048 tokens4,000 tokens102,400 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingNoNoYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenCC-BY-NC-4.0Proprietary
API model ID—c4ai-aya-expanse-32bmistral-large-latest
API providers3211 (best)
ReleasedJul 13, 2024Oct 24, 2024Feb 26, 2024
Knowledge cutoffJun 30, 2024—Nov 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 2 27B$7.80
  • Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
  • Mistral Large$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 2 27B, Aya Expanse 32B or Mistral Large?

Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32) and Gemma 2 27B (28). It leads on inputs & features. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B, Aya Expanse 32B or Mistral Large?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price); Mistral Large costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.65 per million tokens for Gemma 2 27B versus $0.75 for Aya Expanse 32B (1.2× as much) and $0.75 for Mistral Large (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemma 2 27B has an ECI of 122.1, Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet and Mistral Large has an ECI of 122.0.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 2 27B, Aya Expanse 32B and Mistral Large yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Gemma 2 27B and Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Aya Expanse 32B and Mistral Large have the largest context windows (128,000 and 128,000 tokens), against 8,192 for Gemma 2 27B. Maximum output per response: Gemma 2 27B up to 2,048, Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000, Mistral Large up to 102,400 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 2 27B accepts text; Aya Expanse 32B accepts text; Mistral Large accepts text and PDFs. Mistral Large handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma 2 27B and Aya Expanse 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Aya Expanse 32B is the newest, released Oct 24, 2024. Gemma 2 27B came out Jul 13, 2024; Mistral Large came out Feb 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 2 27B Jun 30, 2024, Mistral Large Nov 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.