ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs QwQ 32B

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview comes out ahead, 50 to 43 on our weighted score, though QwQ 32B is 2.7× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

    Released Apr 14, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    QwQ 32B

    Released Mar 5, 2025

    43/100
    • ECI137.6
    • Price$0.66 / $1.00
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove QwQ 32B

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is our pick

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against QwQ 32B (43). It leads on inputs & features. QwQ 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwQ 32BQwQ 32B $0.745 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 · QwQ 32B 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video · QwQ 32B: Text
  • Self-hostingQwQ 32BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewQwQ 32B
Price50%3656
Inputs & features30%9035
Context window20%2424
Overall100%50/10043/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs QwQ 32B specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogleQwQ 32BAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—137.6
ECI rank—#109 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—65.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—59.2%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00$0.66 (best)
Output$5.00$1.00 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$2.00$0.745 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioYesNo
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model ID——
API providers11
ReleasedApr 14, 2026Mar 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
  • QwQ 32B$8.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview or QwQ 32B?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against QwQ 32B (43). It leads on inputs & features. QwQ 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview or QwQ 32B?

QwQ 32B is cheaper at $0.66 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.745 per million tokens for QwQ 32B versus $2.00 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (2.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet and QwQ 32B has an ECI of 137.6.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and QwQ 32B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and QwQ 32B share the same 131,072-token context window. Maximum output per response: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536, QwQ 32B up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video; QwQ 32B accepts text. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

QwQ 32B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the newest, released Apr 14, 2026. QwQ 32B came out Mar 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025, QwQ 32B Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons