ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs Laguna XS.2 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview comes out ahead, 64 to 61 and 36 on our weighted score, though GLM-5V-Turbo is 5% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

    Released Apr 14, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context131K
  2. Poolside

    Laguna XS.2

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    36/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context262K
  3. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5V-Turbo

    Released Apr 1, 2026

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.00
    • Context200K
01 — Verdict

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is our pick

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against GLM-5V-Turbo (61) and Laguna XS.2 (36). It leads on inputs & features. Laguna XS.2 wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGLM-5V-TurboGLM-5V-Turbo $1.90 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Laguna XS.2 unpriced
  • Longest contextLaguna XS.2Laguna XS.2 262,144 · GLM-5V-Turbo 200,000 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and GLM-5V-TurboGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Laguna XS.2: Text · GLM-5V-Turbo: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingLaguna XS.2Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewLaguna XS.2GLM-5V-Turbo
Inputs & features60%903580
Context window40%243732
Overall100%64/10036/10061/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs Laguna XS.2 vs GLM-5V-Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogleLaguna XS.2PoolsideGLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00 (best)—$1.20
Output$5.00—$4.00 (best)
Cached input——$0.24
Blended (3:1)$2.00—$1.90 (best)
Long-context rateSame rate—Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providers—Official Z.AI API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)200,000 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens32,768 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesNoYes
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model ID——glm-5v-turbo
API providers1114 (best)
ReleasedApr 14, 2026Apr 28, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
  • Laguna XS.2—
  • GLM-5V-Turbo$20.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, Laguna XS.2 or GLM-5V-Turbo?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against GLM-5V-Turbo (61) and Laguna XS.2 (36). It leads on inputs & features. Laguna XS.2 wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, Laguna XS.2 or GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper at $1.20 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.90 per million tokens for GLM-5V-Turbo versus $2.00 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (1.1× as much). Laguna XS.2 has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet, Laguna XS.2 has not been scored yet and GLM-5V-Turbo has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, Laguna XS.2 and GLM-5V-Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna XS.2 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for GLM-5V-Turbo and 131,072 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview. Maximum output per response: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536, Laguna XS.2 up to 32,768, GLM-5V-Turbo up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video; Laguna XS.2 accepts text; GLM-5V-Turbo accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Laguna XS.2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and GLM-5V-Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Laguna XS.2 is the newest, released Apr 28, 2026. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview came out Apr 14, 2026; GLM-5V-Turbo came out Apr 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.