ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs Kimi K2.6 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Too close to call on our weighted score (Kimi K2.6 51, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 50, GLM-5V-Turbo 49). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Google

    Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

    Released Apr 14, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context131K
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.6

    Released Apr 21, 2026

    51/100
    • ECI151.1
    • Price$0.95 / $4.00
    • Context262K
  3. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5V-Turbo

    Released Apr 1, 2026

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.00
    • Context200K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Kimi K2.6 51/100, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 50/100, GLM-5V-Turbo 49/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2.6 on price and Kimi K2.6 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceKimi K2.6Kimi K2.6 $1.71 · GLM-5V-Turbo $1.90 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextKimi K2.6Kimi K2.6 262,144 · GLM-5V-Turbo 200,000 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and GLM-5V-TurboGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Kimi K2.6: Text, Images, Video · GLM-5V-Turbo: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingKimi K2.6Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewKimi K2.6GLM-5V-Turbo
Price50%363937
Inputs & features30%908080
Context window20%243732
Overall100%50/10051/10049/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs Kimi K2.6 vs GLM-5V-Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogleKimi K2.6Moonshot AIGLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—151.1—
ECI rank—#45 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—90.8%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—57.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—96.1%—
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues—76.7%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—34.9%—
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00$0.95 (best)$1.20
Output$5.00$4.00 (best)$4.00 (best)
Cached input—$0.16 (best)$0.24
Blended (3:1)$2.00$1.71 (best)$1.90
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Moonshot AI APIOfficial Z.AI API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)200,000 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens262,144 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesYesYes
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model ID—kimi-k2.6glm-5v-turbo
API providers146 (best)14
ReleasedApr 14, 2026Apr 21, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Jan 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
  • Kimi K2.6$17.50
  • GLM-5V-Turbo$20.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, Kimi K2.6 or GLM-5V-Turbo?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Kimi K2.6 51/100, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 50/100, GLM-5V-Turbo 49/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2.6 on price and Kimi K2.6 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, Kimi K2.6 or GLM-5V-Turbo?

Kimi K2.6 is cheaper at $0.95 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price). GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.71 per million tokens for Kimi K2.6 versus $1.90 for GLM-5V-Turbo (1.1× as much) and $2.00 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet, Kimi K2.6 has an ECI of 151.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and GLM-5V-Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.6 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for GLM-5V-Turbo and 131,072 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview. Maximum output per response: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536, Kimi K2.6 up to 262,144, GLM-5V-Turbo up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video; Kimi K2.6 accepts text, images and video; GLM-5V-Turbo accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K2.6 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and GLM-5V-Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K2.6 is the newest, released Apr 21, 2026. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview came out Apr 14, 2026; GLM-5V-Turbo came out Apr 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025, Kimi K2.6 Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.