ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs GLM-5V-Turbo vs Grok Build 0.1

Grok Build 0.1 comes out ahead, 54 to 50 and 49 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Google

    Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

    Released Apr 14, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context131K
  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5V-Turbo

    Released Apr 1, 2026

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.00
    • Context200K
  3. Our pick

    xAI

    Grok Build 0.1

    Released Apr 16, 2026

    54/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $2.00
    • Context256K
01 — Verdict

Grok Build 0.1 is our pick

Grok Build 0.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (50) and GLM-5V-Turbo (49). It leads on price and context window. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGrok Build 0.1Grok Build 0.1 $1.25 · GLM-5V-Turbo $1.90 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGrok Build 0.1Grok Build 0.1 256,000 · GLM-5V-Turbo 200,000 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and GLM-5V-TurboGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video · GLM-5V-Turbo: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Grok Build 0.1: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGLM-5V-TurboGrok Build 0.1
Price50%363745
Inputs & features30%908080
Context window20%243236
Overall100%50/10049/10054/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs GLM-5V-Turbo vs Grok Build 0.1 specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogleGLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)Grok Build 0.1xAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00 (best)$1.20$1.00 (best)
Output$5.00$4.00$2.00 (best)
Cached input—$0.24$0.20 (best)
Blended (3:1)$2.00$1.90$1.25 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.00 / $4.00
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Z.AI APIOfficial xAI API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens200,000 tokens256,000 tokens (best)
Max output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens256,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoYesYes
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesYesNo
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model ID—glm-5v-turbogrok-build-0.1
API providers11419 (best)
ReleasedApr 14, 2026Apr 1, 2026Apr 16, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
  • GLM-5V-Turbo$20.00
  • Grok Build 0.1$14.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, GLM-5V-Turbo or Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (50) and GLM-5V-Turbo (49). It leads on price and context window. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, GLM-5V-Turbo or Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1.00 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.25 per million tokens for Grok Build 0.1 versus $1.90 for GLM-5V-Turbo (1.5× as much) and $2.00 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (1.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet, GLM-5V-Turbo has not been scored yet and Grok Build 0.1 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, GLM-5V-Turbo and Grok Build 0.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok Build 0.1 has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 200,000 for GLM-5V-Turbo and 131,072 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview. Maximum output per response: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536, GLM-5V-Turbo up to 131,072, Grok Build 0.1 up to 256,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video; GLM-5V-Turbo accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Grok Build 0.1 accepts text, images and PDFs. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, GLM-5V-Turbo and Grok Build 0.1 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Grok Build 0.1 is the newest, released Apr 16, 2026. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview came out Apr 14, 2026; GLM-5V-Turbo came out Apr 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.