ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.2

Gemini 4 Argon comes out ahead, 74 to 71 on our weighted score, though Muse Spark 1.2 is 2× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 4 Argon

    Released Oct 13, 2026New

    74/100
    • ECI166.1
    • Price$2.00 / $10.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Meta

    Muse Spark 1.2

    Released Aug 5, 2026

    71/100
    • ECI155.2
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Gemini 4 Argon is our pick

Gemini 4 Argon is the better all-round choice, scoring 74/100 against Muse Spark 1.2 (71). It leads on capability. Muse Spark 1.2 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemini 4 ArgonCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 4 Argon 166.1 · Muse Spark 1.2 155.2
  • Lowest priceMuse Spark 1.2Muse Spark 1.2 $2.00 · Gemini 4 Argon $4.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGemini 4 Argon 1,048,576 · Muse Spark 1.2 1,048,576 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsGemini 4 Argon: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Muse Spark 1.2: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 4 ArgonMuse Spark 1.2
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%9683
Price25%2034
Inputs & features15%100100
Context window10%6161
Overall100%74/10071/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.2 specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 4 ArgonGoogleMuse Spark 1.2Meta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)166.1 (best)155.2
ECI rank#7 of 165 (best)#38 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions96.4%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics86.0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics100%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions76.0% (best)60.3%
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$1.25 (best)
Output$10.00$4.25 (best)
Cached input$0.10 (best)$0.15
Blended (3:1)$4.00$2.00 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Meta API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesYes
AudioYesYes
VideoYesYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgemini-4-argonmuse-spark-1.2
API providers24 (best)18
ReleasedOct 13, 2026Aug 5, 2026
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 4 Argon$40.00
  • Muse Spark 1.2$21.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 4 Argon or Muse Spark 1.2?

Gemini 4 Argon is the better all-round choice, scoring 74/100 against Muse Spark 1.2 (71). It leads on capability. Muse Spark 1.2 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Muse Spark 1.2 versus $4.00 for Gemini 4 Argon (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 4 Argon 166.1 (#7 of 165) and Muse Spark 1.2 155.2 (#38 of 165). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (163.1–170.3 vs 152.9–157.6), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 4 Argon 76.0%, Muse Spark 1.2 60.3%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Spark 1.2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 4 Argon leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Spark 1.2 share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Gemini 4 Argon up to 65,536, Muse Spark 1.2 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 4 Argon accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Muse Spark 1.2 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Spark 1.2 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Gemini 4 Argon is the newest, released Oct 13, 2026. Muse Spark 1.2 came out Aug 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 4 Argon Mar 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.