ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Gemini 3.6 Flash comes out ahead, 72 to 69 and 67 on our weighted score, though Mistral Large 4 is 30% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 3.6 Flash

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    72/100
    • ECI154.7
    • Price$0.75 / $3.75
    • Context1.05M
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 4

    Released Oct 6, 2026NewBeta

    67/100
    • ECI150.6
    • Price$0.70 / $2.10
    • Context1.05M
  3. Meta

    Muse Spark 1.1

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI154.2
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Gemini 3.6 Flash is our pick

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Muse Spark 1.1 (69) and Mistral Large 4 (67). It leads on inputs & features. Mistral Large 4 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemini 3.6 FlashCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.7 · Muse Spark 1.1 154.2 · Mistral Large 4 150.6
  • Lowest priceMistral Large 4Mistral Large 4 $1.05 · Gemini 3.6 Flash $1.50 · Muse Spark 1.1 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGemini 3.6 Flash 1,048,576 · Mistral Large 4 1,048,576 · Muse Spark 1.1 1,048,576 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Mistral Large 4: Text, Images · Muse Spark 1.1: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 3.6 FlashMistral Large 4Muse Spark 1.1
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%827782
Price25%404734
Inputs & features15%1007090
Context window10%616161
Overall100%72/10067/10069/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark 1.1 specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 3.6 FlashGoogleMistral Large 4Mistral AIMuse Spark 1.1Meta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)154.7 (best)150.6154.2
ECI rank#42 of 165 (best)#57 of 165#46 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions94.1% (best)88.1%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics59.0% (best)58.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics94.2%98.3% (best)—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions66.2% (best)20.0%57.8%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.75$0.70 (best)$1.25
Output$3.75$2.10 (best)$4.25
Cached input$0.075$0.07 (best)$0.15
Blended (3:1)$1.50$1.05 (best)$2.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Meta API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens262,144 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoYes
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesNoYes
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · highYeslow · medium · highYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgemini-3.6-flashmistral-large-4muse-spark-1.1
API providers31 (best)1515
ReleasedJul 21, 2026Oct 6, 2026Jul 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 3.6 Flash$15.00
  • Mistral Large 4$11.20
  • Muse Spark 1.1$21.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Mistral Large 4 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Muse Spark 1.1 (69) and Mistral Large 4 (67). It leads on inputs & features. Mistral Large 4 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Mistral Large 4 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper at $0.70 input / $2.10 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 input / $3.75 output per million tokens (official Google API price); Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.05 per million tokens for Mistral Large 4 versus $1.50 for Gemini 3.6 Flash (1.4× as much) and $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.1 (1.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.7 (#42 of 165), Muse Spark 1.1 154.2 (#46 of 165) and Mistral Large 4 150.6 (#57 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (153.0–156.7 vs 151.3–156.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.6 Flash 66.2%, Muse Spark 1.1 57.8%, Mistral Large 4 20.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 3.6 Flash, Mistral Large 4 and Muse Spark 1.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 3.6 Flash leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.6 Flash, Mistral Large 4 and Muse Spark 1.1 share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.6 Flash up to 65,536, Mistral Large 4 up to 262,144, Muse Spark 1.1 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Mistral Large 4 accepts text and images; Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Gemini 3.6 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini 3.6 Flash, Mistral Large 4 and Muse Spark 1.1 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Mistral Large 4 is the newest, released Oct 6, 2026. Gemini 3.6 Flash came out Jul 21, 2026; Muse Spark 1.1 came out Jul 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.6 Flash Mar 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.