ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniCPM5-1B

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite comes out ahead, 84 to 45 and 31 on our weighted score.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

    Released May 7, 2026

    84/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $1.50
    • Context1.05M
  2. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2.5-Pro

    Released Apr 22, 2026

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.435 / $0.87
    • Context1.05M
  3. OpenBMB

    MiniCPM5-1B

    Released May 19, 2026

    31/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is our pick

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro (45) and MiniCPM5-1B (31). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.544 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.563 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · MiniCPM5-1B unpriced
  • Longest contextGemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.5-ProGemini 3.1 Flash Lite 1,048,576 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1,048,576 · MiniCPM5-1B 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Text · MiniCPM5-1B: Text
  • Self-hostingMiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniCPM5-1BPublishes downloadable weights (apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniCPM5-1B
Inputs & features60%1003535
Context window40%616124
Overall100%84/10045/10031/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniCPM5-1B specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogleMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiMiniCPM5-1BOpenBMB
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.25 (best)$0.435—
Output$1.50$0.87 (best)—
Cached input$0.025$0.0036 (best)—
Blended (3:1)$0.563$0.544 (best)—
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate—
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Xiaomi API—
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · highYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpenapache-2.0
API model IDgemini-3.1-flash-litemimo-v2.5-pro—
API providers23 (best)20—
ReleasedMay 7, 2026Apr 22, 2026May 19, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Dec 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$5.50
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro$6.09
  • MiniCPM5-1B—
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniCPM5-1B?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro (45) and MiniCPM5-1B (31). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniCPM5-1B?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.544 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.5-Pro versus $0.563 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (1× as much). MiniCPM5-1B has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has not been scored yet, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has not been scored yet and MiniCPM5-1B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniCPM5-1B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.5-Pro have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 131,072 for MiniCPM5-1B. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite up to 65,536, MiMo-V2.5-Pro up to 131,072, MiniCPM5-1B up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts text; MiniCPM5-1B accepts text. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniCPM5-1B publishes its weights (apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is proprietary.

Which is newer?

MiniCPM5-1B is the newest, released May 19, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite came out May 7, 2026; MiMo-V2.5-Pro came out Apr 22, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Jan 2025, MiMo-V2.5-Pro Dec 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.