ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Hermes 4 405B vs Pixtral Large (25.02)

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 comes out ahead, 48 to 35 and 33 on our weighted score, though Hermes 4 405B is 2.2× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

    Released Jun 5, 2025

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.22 / $9.75
    • Context1.05M
  2. Nous Research

    Hermes 4 405B

    Released Aug 26, 2025

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $3.00
    • Context131K
  3. Mistral AI

    Pixtral Large (25.02)

    Released Apr 8, 2025

    33/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is our pick

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Hermes 4 405B (35) and Pixtral Large (25.02) (33). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Hermes 4 405B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceHermes 4 405BHermes 4 405B $1.50 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 · Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 $3.35 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 1,048,576 · Hermes 4 405B 131,072 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio · Hermes 4 405B: Text · Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images
  • Self-hostingHermes 4 405BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hermes 4 405BPixtral Large (25.02)
Price50%244026
Inputs & features30%803550
Context window20%612524
Overall100%48/10035/10033/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Hermes 4 405B vs Pixtral Large (25.02) specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GoogleHermes 4 405BNous ResearchPixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.22$1.00 (best)$2.00
Output$9.75$3.00 (best)$6.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.35$1.50 (best)$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 4 providersMedian of 5 providersMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)131,072 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens117,964 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioYesNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model ID———
API providers45 (best)3
ReleasedJun 5, 2025Aug 26, 2025Apr 8, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 31, 2025Aug 31, 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$31.69
  • Hermes 4 405B$16.00
  • Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05, Hermes 4 405B or Pixtral Large (25.02)?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Hermes 4 405B (35) and Pixtral Large (25.02) (33). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Hermes 4 405B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05, Hermes 4 405B or Pixtral Large (25.02)?

Hermes 4 405B is cheaper at $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.22 input / $9.75 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.50 per million tokens for Hermes 4 405B versus $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (2× as much) and $3.35 for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (2.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has not been scored yet, Hermes 4 405B has not been scored yet and Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05, Hermes 4 405B and Pixtral Large (25.02) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Hermes 4 405B and 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 up to 65,536, Hermes 4 405B up to 117,964, Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 accepts text, images, PDFs and audio; Hermes 4 405B accepts text; Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Hermes 4 405B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Pixtral Large (25.02) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Hermes 4 405B is the newest, released Aug 26, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 came out Jun 5, 2025; Pixtral Large (25.02) came out Apr 8, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 Jan 31, 2025, Hermes 4 405B Aug 31, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.