Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 vs QwQ 32B vs DeepSeek R1 0528
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 comes out ahead, 67 to 53 and 53 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20
67/100- ECI141.5
- Price$0.146 / $1.96
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)QwQ 32B
53/100- ECI137.5
- Price$0.53 / $0.70
- Context131K
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 0528
53/100- ECI141.2
- Price$0.512 / $2.19
- Context164K
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against DeepSeek R1 0528 (53) and QwQ 32B (53). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 141.5 · DeepSeek R1 0528 141.2 · QwQ 32B 137.5
- Lowest priceQwQ 32BQwQ 32B $0.573 · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 $0.60 · DeepSeek R1 0528 $0.932 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 1,048,576 · DeepSeek R1 0528 163,840 · QwQ 32B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · QwQ 32B: Text · DeepSeek R1 0528: Text
- Self-hostingQwQ 32B and DeepSeek R1 0528Publishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 | QwQ 32B | DeepSeek R1 0528 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 66 | 61 | 66 |
| Price | 25% | 58 | 59 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 90 | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 25 | 28 |
| Overall | 100% | 67/100 | 53/100 | 53/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20Google | QwQ 32BAlibaba (Qwen) | DeepSeek R1 0528DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 141.5 (best) | 137.5 | 141.2 |
| ECI rank | #106 of 165 (best) | #123 of 165 | #108 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 65.3% | 76.3% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 70.8% (best) | 59.2% | 66.4% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.146 (best) | $0.53 | $0.512 |
| Output | $1.96 | $0.70 (best) | $2.19 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.60 | $0.573 (best) | $0.932 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Median of 2 providers | Median of 16 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens | 163,840 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | OpenMIT |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 2 | 2 | 16 (best) |
| Released | May 20, 2025 | Mar 5, 2025 | May 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | Apr 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20$5.39
- QwQ 32B$6.70
- DeepSeek R1 0528$9.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20, QwQ 32B or DeepSeek R1 0528?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against DeepSeek R1 0528 (53) and QwQ 32B (53). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20, QwQ 32B or DeepSeek R1 0528?
QwQ 32B is cheaper at $0.53 input / $0.70 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 costs $0.146 input / $1.96 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.512 input / $2.19 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.573 per million tokens for QwQ 32B versus $0.60 for Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (1× as much) and $0.932 for DeepSeek R1 0528 (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 141.5 (#106 of 165), DeepSeek R1 0528 141.2 (#108 of 165) and QwQ 32B 137.5 (#123 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (139.3–142.9 vs 139.0–142.9), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 70.8%, DeepSeek R1 0528 66.4%, QwQ 32B 59.2%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20, QwQ 32B and DeepSeek R1 0528 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 163,840 for DeepSeek R1 0528 and 131,072 for QwQ 32B. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 up to 65,536, QwQ 32B up to 8,192, DeepSeek R1 0528 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; QwQ 32B accepts text; DeepSeek R1 0528 accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
QwQ 32B and DeepSeek R1 0528 publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is the newest, released May 28, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 came out May 20, 2025; QwQ 32B came out Mar 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 Jan 2025, QwQ 32B Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 vs Kimi K2 InstructMoonshot AI · ECI 139.9
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 vs GPT-5 MiniOpenAI · ECI 145.4
- QwQ 32B vs DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek · ECI 135.9
- QwQ 32B vs GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · ECI 134.9
- QwQ 32B vs Kimi K2 InstructMoonshot AI · ECI 139.9
- DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · ECI 140.6
