ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Sarvam 105B vs Tiny Aya Earth

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 84 to 31 and 15 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

    Released Jun 17, 2025

    84/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.40
    • Context1.05M
  2. Sarvam AI

    Sarvam 105B

    Released Feb 18, 2026

    31/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.158 / $0.632
    • Context131K
  3. Cohere

    Tiny Aya Earth

    Released Feb 17, 2026

    15/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context8K
01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is our pick

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Sarvam 105B (31) and Tiny Aya Earth (15). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.175 · Sarvam 105B $0.276 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Tiny Aya Earth unpriced
  • Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Sarvam 105B 131,072 · Tiny Aya Earth 8,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Sarvam 105B: Text · Tiny Aya Earth: Text
  • Self-hostingSarvam 105B and Tiny Aya EarthPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteSarvam 105BTiny Aya Earth
Inputs & features60%1003525
Context window40%61250
Overall100%84/10031/10015/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Sarvam 105B vs Tiny Aya Earth specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogleSarvam 105BSarvam AITiny Aya EarthCohere
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.10 (best)$0.158—
Output$0.40 (best)$0.632—
Cached input$0.01 (best)$0.053—
Blended (3:1)$0.175 (best)$0.276—
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate—
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Sarvam AI API—
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)131,072 tokens8,000 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)8,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · highNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpenCC-BY-NC-4.0
API model IDgemini-2.5-flash-litesarvam-105btiny-aya-earth
API providers24 (best)31
ReleasedJun 17, 2025Feb 18, 2026Feb 17, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite$1.80
  • Sarvam 105B$2.84
  • Tiny Aya Earth—
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Sarvam 105B or Tiny Aya Earth?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Sarvam 105B (31) and Tiny Aya Earth (15). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Sarvam 105B or Tiny Aya Earth?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Sarvam 105B costs $0.158 input / $0.632 output per million tokens (official Sarvam AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite versus $0.276 for Sarvam 105B (1.6× as much). Tiny Aya Earth has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet, Sarvam 105B has not been scored yet and Tiny Aya Earth has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Sarvam 105B and Tiny Aya Earth yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Sarvam 105B and 8,000 for Tiny Aya Earth. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite up to 65,536, Sarvam 105B up to 131,072, Tiny Aya Earth up to 8,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Sarvam 105B accepts text; Tiny Aya Earth accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Sarvam 105B and Tiny Aya Earth publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Sarvam 105B is the newest, released Feb 18, 2026. Tiny Aya Earth came out Feb 17, 2026; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite came out Jun 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.