Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Solar Pro 2
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 83 to 62 and 51 on our weighted score, though Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 2.8× cheaper per token.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
83/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
62/100- ECI118.5
- Price$0.05 / $0.10
- Context131K
UpstageSolar Pro 2
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (62) and Solar Pro 2 (51). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct $0.063 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.175 · Solar Pro 2 $0.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 131,072 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: Text · Solar Pro 2: Text
- Self-hostingQwen2.5 7B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Solar Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 82 | 100 | 75 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 100 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 25 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 83/100 | 62/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle | Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) | Solar Pro 2Upstage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 118.5 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #159 of 165 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 35.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 2.5% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 | $0.05 (best) | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.40 | $0.10 (best) | $0.25 |
| Cached input | $0.01 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 | $0.063 (best) | $0.25 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Google API | Median of 3 providers | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yesminimal · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gemini-2.5-flash-lite | — | solar-pro2 |
| API providers | 24 (best) | 4 | 2 |
| Released | Jun 17, 2025 | Sep 19, 2024 | May 20, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | — | Mar 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite$1.80
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct$0.70
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct or Solar Pro 2?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (62) and Solar Pro 2 (51). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct or Solar Pro 2?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Google API price); Solar Pro 2 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.063 per million tokens for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct versus $0.175 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (2.8× as much) and $0.25 for Solar Pro 2 (4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has an ECI of 118.5 and Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Solar Pro 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and 65,536 for Solar Pro 2. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite up to 65,536, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct up to 8,192, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Qwen2.5 7B Instruct accepts text; Solar Pro 2 accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the newest, released Jun 17, 2025. Solar Pro 2 came out May 20, 2025; Qwen2.5 7B Instruct came out Sep 19, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jan 2025, Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen FlashAlibaba (Qwen)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs ERNIE 4.5 21B A3BBaidu
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Llama-3.1-8B-InstructMeta · ECI 116.4
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Mistral NemoMistral AI · ECI 118.6
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Gemma 3 4B ITGoogle · ECI 115.8
