Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen MT Plus vs Solar Pro 2
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 83 to 51 and 11 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
83/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen MT Plus
11/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
UpstageSolar Pro 2
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against Solar Pro 2 (51) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.175 · Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · Qwen MT Plus $3.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 · Qwen MT Plus 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Qwen MT Plus: Text · Solar Pro 2: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen MT Plus | Solar Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 82 | 22 | 75 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 100 | 0 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 0 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 83/100 | 11/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle | Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | Solar Pro 2Upstage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $2.46 | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.40 | $7.37 | $0.25 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.01 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 (best) | $3.69 | $0.25 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Google API | Official Alibaba API | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yesminimal · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gemini-2.5-flash-lite | qwen-mt-plus | solar-pro2 |
| API providers | 24 (best) | 3 | 2 |
| Released | Jun 17, 2025 | Jul 24, 2025 | May 20, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | — | Mar 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite$1.80
- Qwen MT Plus$39.34
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Qwen MT Plus or Solar Pro 2?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against Solar Pro 2 (51) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Qwen MT Plus or Solar Pro 2?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Solar Pro 2 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price); Qwen MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite versus $0.25 for Solar Pro 2 (1.4× as much) and $3.69 for Qwen MT Plus (21× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet, Qwen MT Plus has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Qwen MT Plus and Solar Pro 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen MT Plus does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 65,536 for Solar Pro 2 and 16,384 for Qwen MT Plus. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite up to 65,536, Qwen MT Plus up to 8,192, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Qwen MT Plus accepts text; Solar Pro 2 accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Qwen MT Plus and Solar Pro 2 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Qwen MT Plus is the newest, released Jul 24, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite came out Jun 17, 2025; Solar Pro 2 came out May 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jan 2025, Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
