Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM-4.5V vs Morph V3 Fast
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 83 to 48 and 32 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
83/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context1.05M
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5V
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $1.80
- Context64K
Morph
Morph V3 Fast
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $1.20
- Context262K
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against GLM-4.5V (48) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.175 · GLM-4.5V $0.90 · Morph V3 Fast $0.90 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Morph V3 Fast 262,144 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · GLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video · Morph V3 Fast: Text
- Self-hostingGLM-4.5VPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V | Morph V3 Fast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 82 | 50 | 50 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 100 | 70 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 12 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 83/100 | 48/100 | 32/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle | GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu) | Morph V3 FastMorph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.60 | $0.80 |
| Output | $0.40 (best) | $1.80 | $1.20 |
| Cached input | $0.01 (best) | $0.11 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 (best) | $0.90 | $0.90 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Google API | Official Z.AI API | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 16,384 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gemini-2.5-flash-lite | glm-4.5v | — |
| API providers | 24 (best) | 17 | 5 |
| Released | Jun 17, 2025 | Aug 11, 2025 | Jul 7, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | Apr 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite$1.80
- GLM-4.5V$9.60
- Morph V3 Fast$10.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, GLM-4.5V or Morph V3 Fast?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against GLM-4.5V (48) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, GLM-4.5V or Morph V3 Fast?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Google API price). GLM-4.5V costs $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Morph V3 Fast costs $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite versus $0.90 for GLM-4.5V (5.1× as much) and $0.90 for Morph V3 Fast (5.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet, GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet and Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, GLM-4.5V and Morph V3 Fast yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Morph V3 Fast does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Morph V3 Fast and 64,000 for GLM-4.5V. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite up to 65,536, GLM-4.5V up to 16,384, Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video; Morph V3 Fast accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-4.5V publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Morph V3 Fast is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.5V is the newest, released Aug 11, 2025. Morph V3 Fast came out Jul 7, 2025; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite came out Jun 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jan 2025, GLM-4.5V Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
