Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 comes out ahead, 81 to 60 on our weighted score, though MiMo-V2-Flash is 10% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025
81/100- ECI—
- Price$0.095 / $0.38
- Context1.05M
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
60/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.30
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 is the better all-round choice, scoring 81/100 against MiMo-V2-Flash (60). It leads on inputs & features and context window. MiMo-V2-Flash wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2-FlashMiMo-V2-Flash $0.15 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 $0.166 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 1,048,576 · MiMo-V2-Flash 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · MiMo-V2-Flash: Text
- Self-hostingMiMo-V2-FlashPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 83 | 85 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 90 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 81/100 | 60/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.095 (best) | $0.10 |
| Output | $0.38 | $0.30 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.166 | $0.15 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 2 | 4 (best) |
| Released | Sep 25, 2025 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | Dec 1, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025$1.71
MiMo-V2-Flash$1.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 or MiMo-V2-Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 is the better all-round choice, scoring 81/100 against MiMo-V2-Flash (60). It leads on inputs & features and context window. MiMo-V2-Flash wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 costs $0.095 input / $0.38 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for MiMo-V2-Flash versus $0.166 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2-Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 and MiMo-V2-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for MiMo-V2-Flash. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 up to 65,536, MiMo-V2-Flash up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; MiMo-V2-Flash accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiMo-V2-Flash publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the newest, released Dec 16, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 came out Sep 25, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 Jan 2025, MiMo-V2-Flash Dec 1, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.