Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 81, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 78, Qwen3 30B A3B 55). The right pick depends on what you value most.
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17
78/100- ECI133.8
- Price$0.12 / $0.48
- Context1.05M
- Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025
81/100- ECI—
- Price$0.095 / $0.38
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 30B A3B
55/100- ECI136.2
- Price$0.108 / $0.475
- Context131K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 81/100, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 78/100, Qwen3 30B A3B 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 $0.166 · Qwen3 30B A3B $0.20 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 $0.21 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 1,048,576 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 1,048,576 · Qwen3 30B A3B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Qwen3 30B A3B: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3 30B A3BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 79 | 83 | 80 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 90 | 90 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 61 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 78/100 | 81/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17Google | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025Google | Qwen3 30B A3BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 133.8 | — | 136.2 (best) |
| ECI rank | #132 of 165 | — | #126 of 165 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | — | 61.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | — | 62.8% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.12 | $0.095 (best) | $0.108 |
| Output | $0.48 | $0.38 (best) | $0.475 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.21 | $0.166 (best) | $0.20 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Median of 2 providers | Median of 14 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 2 | 2 | 14 (best) |
| Released | Jun 17, 2025 | Sep 25, 2025 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17$2.16
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025$1.71
- Qwen3 30B A3B$2.03
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 or Qwen3 30B A3B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 81/100, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 78/100, Qwen3 30B A3B 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 or Qwen3 30B A3B?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 is cheaper at $0.095 input / $0.38 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.108 input / $0.475 output per million tokens (median across 14 API providers); Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 costs $0.12 input / $0.48 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.166 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 versus $0.20 for Qwen3 30B A3B (1.2× as much) and $0.21 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 has an ECI of 133.8, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 has not been scored yet and Qwen3 30B A3B has an ECI of 136.2.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 and Qwen3 30B A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 131,072 for Qwen3 30B A3B. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 up to 65,536, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 up to 65,536, Qwen3 30B A3B up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Qwen3 30B A3B accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 30B A3B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 is the newest, released Sep 25, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 came out Jun 17, 2025; Qwen3 30B A3B came out Apr 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 Jan 2025, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.3
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs Magistral SmallMistral AI · ECI 133.1
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek · ECI 135.9
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 vs Ministral 14BMistral AI
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 vs Rnj-1 InstructEssential AI
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 09-2025 vs Apertus 8BSwiss AI
