ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Seed 2.0 Lite

Seed 2.0 Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 35 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Google

    Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview

    Released Oct 7, 2025

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview
  2. Our pick

    ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.0 Lite

    Released Feb 14, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.089 / $0.534
    • Context256K
    Full specs Remove Seed 2.0 Lite

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Seed 2.0 Lite is our pick

Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (35). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite $0.20 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite 256,000 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview: Text, Images · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewSeed 2.0 Lite
Price50%2483
Inputs & features30%6080
Context window20%2436
Overall100%35/10073/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Seed 2.0 Lite specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogleSeed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$0.089 (best)
Output$10.00$0.534 (best)
Cached input—$0.018
Blended (3:1)$3.44$0.20 (best)
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $15.00Over 32K: $0.134 / $0.802
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Volcengine Ark API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens (best)
Max output64,000 tokens (best)32,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoYes
ReasoningYesYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgemini-2.5-computer-use-preview-10-2025doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428
API providers26 (best)
ReleasedOct 7, 2025Feb 14, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview$32.50
  • Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Seed 2.0 Lite?

Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (35). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Seed 2.0 Lite?

Seed 2.0 Lite is cheaper at $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Seed 2.0 Lite versus $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (17× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview has not been scored yet and Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and Seed 2.0 Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Lite has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview up to 64,000, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview accepts text and images; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and Seed 2.0 Lite are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.0 Lite is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview came out Oct 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons