Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 67, Gemini 2.0 Flash 67). The right pick depends on what you value most.
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash
67/100- ECI134.7
- Price$0.10 / $0.42
- Context1.05M
- Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17
67/100- ECI133.8
- Price$0.12 / $0.48
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 67/100, Gemini 2.0 Flash 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 2.0 Flash for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemini 2.0 FlashCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.0 Flash 134.7 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 133.8
- Lowest priceGemini 2.0 FlashGemini 2.0 Flash $0.18 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 $0.21 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameGemini 2.0 Flash 1,048,576 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGemini 2.0 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 58 | 57 |
| Price | 25% | 82 | 79 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 90 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 67/100 | 67/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.0 FlashGoogle | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17Google |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 134.7 (best) | 133.8 |
| ECI rank | #130 of 165 (best) | #132 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 64.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 31.1% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.12 |
| Output | $0.42 (best) | $0.48 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18 (best) | $0.21 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 2 | 2 |
| Released | Dec 11, 2024 | Jun 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2024 | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.0 Flash$1.84
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17$2.16
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.0 Flash or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 67/100, Gemini 2.0 Flash 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 2.0 Flash for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.42 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 costs $0.12 input / $0.48 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.18 per million tokens for Gemini 2.0 Flash versus $0.21 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemini 2.0 Flash scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.0 Flash 134.7 (#130 of 165) and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 133.8 (#132 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (131.4–136.5 vs 130.1–136.1), so treat the gap as small.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 2.0 Flash leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.0 Flash up to 8,192, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 is the newest, released Jun 17, 2025. Gemini 2.0 Flash came out Dec 11, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.0 Flash Jun 2024, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3 30B A3BThree-way comparison
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 136.2
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BDeepSeek
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.3
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · ECI 134.9
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs Qwen3 30B A3BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 136.2
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.3
