Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Nova Lite vs Solar Pro 2
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 82 to 75 and 51 on our weighted score, though Nova Lite is 6% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
82/100- ECI—
- Price$0.064 / $0.255
- Context1.05M
AmazonNova Lite
75/100- ECI—
- Price$0.06 / $0.24
- Context300K
UpstageSolar Pro 2
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is our pick
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 82/100 against Nova Lite (75) and Solar Pro 2 (51). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova LiteNova Lite $0.105 · Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite $0.111 · Solar Pro 2 $0.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Nova Lite 300,000 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Nova Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Solar Pro 2: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Nova Lite | Solar Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 91 | 92 | 75 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 39 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 82/100 | 75/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGoogle | Nova LiteAmazon | Solar Pro 2Upstage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.064 | $0.06 (best) | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.255 | $0.24 (best) | $0.25 |
| Cached input | — | $0.015 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.111 | $0.105 (best) | $0.25 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 300,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 10,000 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yesminimal · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | amazon.nova-lite-v1:0 | solar-pro2 |
| API providers | 3 | 8 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Dec 11, 2024 | Dec 3, 2024 | May 20, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2024 | Oct 2024 | Mar 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite$1.15
- Nova Lite$1.08
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, Nova Lite or Solar Pro 2?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 82/100 against Nova Lite (75) and Solar Pro 2 (51). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, Nova Lite or Solar Pro 2?
Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.24 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite costs $0.064 input / $0.255 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Solar Pro 2 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.105 per million tokens for Nova Lite versus $0.111 for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (1.1× as much) and $0.25 for Solar Pro 2 (2.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet, Nova Lite has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, Nova Lite and Solar Pro 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 300,000 for Nova Lite and 65,536 for Solar Pro 2. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite up to 8,192, Nova Lite up to 10,000, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Nova Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Solar Pro 2 accepts text. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, Nova Lite and Solar Pro 2 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Solar Pro 2 is the newest, released May 20, 2025. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite came out Dec 11, 2024; Nova Lite came out Dec 3, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Jun 2024, Nova Lite Oct 2024, Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
