Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 72 to 25 and 10 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
72/100- ECI—
- Price$0.064 / $0.255
- Context1.05M
Nous ResearchHermes 3 70B Instruct
10/100- ECI—
- Price$0.70 / $0.70
- Context131K
NVIDIANemotron Mini 4B Instruct
25/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context128K
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is our pick
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct (25) and Hermes 3 70B Instruct (10). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite $0.111 · Hermes 3 70B Instruct $0.70 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct unpriced
- Longest contextGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Hermes 3 70B Instruct 131,072 · Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Hermes 3 70B Instruct: Text · Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingHermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron Mini 4B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Hermes 3 70B Instruct | Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 80 | 0 | 25 |
| Context window | 40% | 61 | 25 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 72/100 | 10/100 | 25/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGoogle | Hermes 3 70B InstructNous Research | Nemotron Mini 4B InstructNVIDIA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.064 (best) | $0.70 | — |
| Output | $0.255 (best) | $0.70 | — |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.111 (best) | $0.70 | — |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | — |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Median of 5 providers | — |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 16,384 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 3 | 5 (best) | — |
| Released | Dec 11, 2024 | Aug 18, 2024 | Aug 21, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite$1.15
- Hermes 3 70B Instruct$8.40
- Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct—
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct (25) and Hermes 3 70B Instruct (10). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.064 input / $0.255 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs $0.70 input / $0.70 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.111 per million tokens for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite versus $0.70 for Hermes 3 70B Instruct (6.3× as much). Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet, Hermes 3 70B Instruct has not been scored yet and Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Hermes 3 70B Instruct does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and 128,000 for Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite up to 8,192, Hermes 3 70B Instruct up to 16,384, Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Hermes 3 70B Instruct accepts text; Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct accepts text. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the newest, released Dec 11, 2024. Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct came out Aug 21, 2024; Hermes 3 70B Instruct came out Aug 18, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Jun 2024, Hermes 3 70B Instruct Dec 31, 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
