Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Command R7B
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 78 to 25 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
78/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context1.05M
CohereCommand R7B
25/100- ECI—
- Price$0.037 / $0.15
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is our pick
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Command R7B (25). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCommand R7BCommand R7B $0.066 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite unpriced
- Longest contextGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Command R7B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Command R7B: Text
- Self-hostingCommand R7BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Command R7B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 90 | 25 |
| Context window | 40% | 61 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 78/100 | 25/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGoogle | Command R7BCohere |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $0.037 |
| Output | — | $0.15 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.066 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens (best) | 4,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | command-r7b-12-2024 |
| API providers | — | 5 |
| Released | Dec 11, 2024 | Dec 2, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2024 | Jun 1, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite—
- Command R7B$0.675
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Command R7B?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Command R7B (25). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Command R7B?
Command R7B is cheaper at $0.037 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.066 per million tokens for Command R7B versus . Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet and Command R7B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Command R7B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 128,000 for Command R7B. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite up to 8,192, Command R7B up to 4,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Command R7B accepts text. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Command R7B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the newest, released Dec 11, 2024. Command R7B came out Dec 2, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Jun 2024, Command R7B Jun 1, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
