ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Fugu Ultra vs GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Mythos 5

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-6 Astra 36, Claude Mythos 5 36, Fugu Ultra 33). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Sakana AI

    Fugu Ultra

    Released Jun 15, 2026

    33/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$5.00 / $30.00
    • Context1M
  2. OpenAI

    GPT-6 Astra

    Released Sep 4, 2026

    36/100
    • ECI166.5
    • Price$10.00 / $50.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Anthropic

    Claude Mythos 5

    Released Jun 9, 2026

    36/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$10.00 / $50.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-6 Astra 36/100, Claude Mythos 5 36/100, Fugu Ultra 33/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Fugu Ultra on price and GPT-6 Astra for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceFugu UltraFugu Ultra $11.25 · GPT-6 Astra $20.00 · Claude Mythos 5 $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Astra 1,050,000 · Fugu Ultra 1,000,000 · Claude Mythos 5 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-6 Astra and Claude Mythos 5Fugu Ultra: Text, Images · GPT-6 Astra: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Mythos 5: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightFugu UltraGPT-6 AstraClaude Mythos 5
Price50%000
Inputs & features30%708080
Context window20%606160
Overall100%33/10036/10036/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Fugu Ultra vs GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Mythos 5 specifications side by side
SpecificationFugu UltraSakana AIGPT-6 AstraOpenAIClaude Mythos 5Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—166.5—
ECI rank—#2 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—95.8%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—93.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—100%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—75.6%—
Price per million tokens
Input$5.00 (best)$10.00$10.00
Output$30.00 (best)$50.00$50.00
Cached input$0.50 (best)$1.00—
Blended (3:1)$11.25 (best)$20.00$20.00
Long-context rateOver 272K: $10.00 / $45.00Over 272K: $20.00 / $75.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Sakana AI APIOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output—128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoYesYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeshigh · xhighYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDfugu-ultragpt-6-astra—
API providers1126 (best)2
ReleasedJun 15, 2026Sep 4, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 30, 2026Jan 31, 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Fugu Ultra$110.00
  • GPT-6 Astra$200.00
  • Claude Mythos 5$200.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Fugu Ultra, GPT-6 Astra or Claude Mythos 5?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-6 Astra 36/100, Claude Mythos 5 36/100, Fugu Ultra 33/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Fugu Ultra on price and GPT-6 Astra for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Fugu Ultra, GPT-6 Astra or Claude Mythos 5?

Fugu Ultra is cheaper at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per million tokens (official Sakana AI API price). GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Claude Mythos 5 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $11.25 per million tokens for Fugu Ultra versus $20.00 for GPT-6 Astra (1.8× as much) and $20.00 for Claude Mythos 5 (1.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Fugu Ultra has not been scored yet, GPT-6 Astra has an ECI of 166.5 and Claude Mythos 5 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Fugu Ultra, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Mythos 5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Astra has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Fugu Ultra and 1,000,000 for Claude Mythos 5. Maximum output per response: GPT-6 Astra up to 128,000, Claude Mythos 5 up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Fugu Ultra accepts text and images; GPT-6 Astra accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Mythos 5 accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-6 Astra handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Fugu Ultra, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Mythos 5 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

GPT-6 Astra is the newest, released Sep 4, 2026. Fugu Ultra came out Jun 15, 2026; Claude Mythos 5 came out Jun 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-6 Astra Apr 30, 2026, Claude Mythos 5 Jan 31, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.