Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
Claude Haiku 5.5 comes out ahead, 83 to 68 and 66 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1
66/100- ECI166.4
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
- Our pickAnthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
83/100- ECI160.4
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context1M
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra
68/100- ECI169.1
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1.05M
Claude Haiku 5.5 is our pick
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against GPT-6 Astra (68) and Claude Fable 5.1 (66). It leads on price. GPT-6 Astra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-6 AstraCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 169.1 · Claude Fable 5.1 166.4 · Claude Haiku 5.5 160.4
- Lowest priceClaude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.20 · Claude Fable 5.1 $20.00 · GPT-6 Astra $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Astra 1,050,000 · Claude Fable 5.1 1,000,000 · Claude Haiku 5.5 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsClaude Fable 5.1: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Haiku 5.5: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-6 Astra: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 97 | 89 | 100 |
| Price | 25% | 0 | 80 | 0 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 60 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 66/100 | 83/100 | 68/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 166.4 | 160.4 | 169.1 (best) |
| ECI rank | #6 of 165 | #14 of 165 | #1 of 165 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 89.7% | 95.8% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 90.2% | 75.1% | 93.7% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 100% (best) | 98.9% | 100% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 70.8% | 23.8% | 75.6% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $10.00 | $0.10 (best) | $10.00 |
| Output | $50.00 | $0.50 (best) | $50.00 |
| Cached input | $0.25 | $0.01 (best) | $1.00 |
| Blended (3:1) | $20.00 | $0.20 (best) | $20.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 100K: $0.50 / $2.50 | Over 272K: $20.00 / $75.00 |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Official Anthropic API | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | claude-fable-5-1 | claude-haiku-5-5 | gpt-6-astra |
| API providers | 37 (best) | 33 | 37 (best) |
| Released | Sep 1, 2026 | Oct 7, 2026 | Sep 4, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2026 | Jun 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Fable 5.1$200.00
- Claude Haiku 5.5$2.00
- GPT-6 Astra$200.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against GPT-6 Astra (68) and Claude Fable 5.1 (66). It leads on price. GPT-6 Astra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price); GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Claude Haiku 5.5 versus $20.00 for Claude Fable 5.1 (100× as much) and $20.00 for GPT-6 Astra (100× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-6 Astra scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 169.1 (#1 of 165), Claude Fable 5.1 166.4 (#6 of 165) and Claude Haiku 5.5 160.4 (#14 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (165.9–174.3 vs 163.6–170.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6 Astra 93.7%, Claude Fable 5.1 90.2%, Claude Haiku 5.5 75.1%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Claude Fable 5.1 100%, GPT-6 Astra 100%, Claude Haiku 5.5 98.9%; SimpleQA Verified — GPT-6 Astra 75.6%, Claude Fable 5.1 70.8%, Claude Haiku 5.5 23.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6 Astra leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Astra has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5.1 and 1,000,000 for Claude Haiku 5.5. Maximum output per response: Claude Fable 5.1 up to 128,000, Claude Haiku 5.5 up to 128,000, GPT-6 Astra up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Fable 5.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-6 Astra accepts text, images and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the newest, released Oct 7, 2026. GPT-6 Astra came out Sep 4, 2026; Claude Fable 5.1 came out Sep 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Fable 5.1 Jun 2026, Claude Haiku 5.5 Jun 2026, GPT-6 Astra Apr 30, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle · ECI 166.1
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse WonderMeta · ECI 161.7
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ECI 158.3
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek · ECI 158.8
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaOpenAI · ECI 156.8
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 153.2
