Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K3
Too close to call on our weighted score (Claude Fable 5.1 66, Kimi K3 65, GPT-5.4 65). The right pick depends on what you value most.
AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1
66/100- ECI164.8
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
OpenAIGPT-5.4
65/100- ECI156.9
- Price$2.50 / $15.00
- Context1.05M
Moonshot AIKimi K3
65/100- ECI157.6
- Price$3.00 / $15.00
- Context1.05M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Claude Fable 5.1 66/100, Kimi K3 65/100, GPT-5.4 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Fable 5.1 for raw capability and GPT-5.4 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Fable 5.1Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Fable 5.1 164.8 · Kimi K3 157.6 · GPT-5.4 156.9
- Lowest priceGPT-5.4GPT-5.4 $5.63 · Kimi K3 $6.00 · Claude Fable 5.1 $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5.4 and Kimi K3GPT-5.4 1,050,000 · Kimi K3 1,048,576 · Claude Fable 5.1 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsClaude Fable 5.1: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-5.4: Text, Images, PDFs · Kimi K3: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingKimi K3Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.4 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 97 | 87 | 88 |
| Price | 25% | 0 | 14 | 13 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 66/100 | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | GPT-5.4OpenAI | Kimi K3Moonshot AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 164.8 (best) | 156.9 | 157.6 |
| ECI rank | #4 of 148 (best) | #16 of 148 | #13 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 93.3% (best) | 93.1% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 90.2% (best) | 78.6% | 72.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 100% (best) | 97.8% | 97.2% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 76.9% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 70.8% (best) | 45.1% | 50.6% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $10.00 | $2.50 (best) | $3.00 |
| Output | $50.00 | $15.00 (best) | $15.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.25 (best) | $0.25 (best) | $0.30 |
| Blended (3:1) | $20.00 | $5.63 (best) | $6.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 272K: $5.00 / $22.50 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Official OpenAI API | Official Moonshot AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yeslow · high · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | claude-fable-5-1 | gpt-5.4 | kimi-k3 |
| API providers | 29 | 36 | 68 (best) |
| Released | Sep 1, 2026 | Mar 5, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2026 | Aug 31, 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Fable 5.1$200.00
- GPT-5.4$55.00
- Kimi K3$60.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-5.4 or Kimi K3?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Claude Fable 5.1 66/100, Kimi K3 65/100, GPT-5.4 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Fable 5.1 for raw capability and GPT-5.4 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-5.4 or Kimi K3?
GPT-5.4 is cheaper at $2.50 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Kimi K3 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price); Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $5.63 per million tokens for GPT-5.4 versus $6.00 for Kimi K3 (1.1× as much) and $20.00 for Claude Fable 5.1 (3.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Fable 5.1 164.8 (#4 of 148), Kimi K3 157.6 (#13 of 148) and GPT-5.4 156.9 (#16 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (161.8–169.1 vs 154.9–160.4), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Claude Fable 5.1 90.2%, GPT-5.4 78.6%, Kimi K3 72.2%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Claude Fable 5.1 100%, GPT-5.4 97.8%, Kimi K3 97.2%; SimpleQA Verified — Claude Fable 5.1 70.8%, Kimi K3 50.6%, GPT-5.4 45.1%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Fable 5.1 and Kimi K3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Fable 5.1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 and Kimi K3 have the largest context windows (1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5.1. Maximum output per response: Claude Fable 5.1 up to 128,000, GPT-5.4 up to 128,000, Kimi K3 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Fable 5.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-5.4 accepts text, images and PDFs; Kimi K3 accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Kimi K3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.4 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Claude Fable 5.1 is the newest, released Sep 1, 2026. Kimi K3 came out Jul 16, 2026; GPT-5.4 came out Mar 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Fable 5.1 Jun 2026, GPT-5.4 Aug 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
