Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed comes out ahead, 46 to 36 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Fireworks AIEmber-1
36/100- ECI—
- Price$3.00 / $15.00
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
46/100- ECI—
- Price$4.35 / $8.70
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is our pick
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against Ember-1 (36). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $5.44 · Ember-1 $6.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameEmber-1 1,048,576 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedEmber-1: Text, Images · MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Ember-1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 12 | 14 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 90 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 36/100 | 46/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ember-1Fireworks AI | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $3.00 (best) | $4.35 |
| Output | $15.00 | $8.70 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.036 |
| Blended (3:1) | $6.00 | $5.44 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 7 providers | Official Xiaomi API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | mimo-v2.6-pro-ultraspeed |
| API providers | 7 | 9 (best) |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ember-1$60.00
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed$60.90
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ember-1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against Ember-1 (36). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is cheaper at $4.35 input / $8.70 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). Ember-1 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (median across 7 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $5.44 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed versus $6.00 for Ember-1 (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Ember-1 has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ember-1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ember-1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Ember-1 up to 131,072, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ember-1 accepts text and images; MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text, images, audio and video. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Ember-1 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Ember-1 is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed came out Sep 21, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
