DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Mercury 2.5 vs Solar Mini 4
Too close to call on our weighted score (DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 65, Solar Mini 4 64, Mercury 2.5 55). The right pick depends on what you value most.
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.216 / $0.647
- Context1M
InceptionMercury 2.5
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.75
- Context260K
UpstageSolar Mini 4
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context524K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 65/100, Solar Mini 4 64/100, Mercury 2.5 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Solar Mini 4 on price and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Mini 4Solar Mini 4 $0.175 · DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $0.323 · Mercury 2.5 $0.338 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 1,000,000 · Solar Mini 4 524,288 · Mercury 2.5 260,000 tokens
- Widest inputsDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: Text, Images · Mercury 2.5: Text · Solar Mini 4: Text
- Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpPublishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | Mercury 2.5 | Solar Mini 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 70 | 69 | 82 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 45 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 36 | 49 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 55/100 | 64/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek | Mercury 2.5Inception | Solar Mini 4Upstage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.216 | $0.20 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.647 | $0.75 | $0.40 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.02 | $0.01 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.323 | $0.338 | $0.175 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 14 providers | Official Inception API | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 260,000 tokens | 524,288 tokens |
| Max output | 384,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenMIT | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | mercury-2.5 | solar-mini4 |
| API providers | 15 (best) | 6 | 4 |
| Released | Aug 21, 2026 | Sep 8, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Feb 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$3.45
- Mercury 2.5$3.50
- Solar Mini 4$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, Mercury 2.5 or Solar Mini 4?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 65/100, Solar Mini 4 64/100, Mercury 2.5 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Solar Mini 4 on price and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, Mercury 2.5 or Solar Mini 4?
Solar Mini 4 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.216 input / $0.647 output per million tokens (median across 14 API providers); Mercury 2.5 costs $0.20 input / $0.75 output per million tokens (official Inception API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Solar Mini 4 versus $0.323 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (1.8× as much) and $0.338 for Mercury 2.5 (1.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has not been scored yet, Mercury 2.5 has not been scored yet and Solar Mini 4 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, Mercury 2.5 and Solar Mini 4 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 524,288 for Solar Mini 4 and 260,000 for Mercury 2.5. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp up to 384,000, Mercury 2.5 up to 65,536, Solar Mini 4 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp accepts text and images; Mercury 2.5 accepts text; Solar Mini 4 accepts text. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Mercury 2.5 and Solar Mini 4 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Solar Mini 4 is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. Mercury 2.5 came out Sep 8, 2026; DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp came out Aug 21, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Mini 4 Feb 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
