ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GPT-6 Luna vs Inkling Small

GPT-6 Luna comes out ahead, 78 to 69 and 62 on our weighted score, though DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 13% cheaper per token.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

    Released Jul 31, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI154.5
    • Price$0.14 / $0.28
    • Context1M
  2. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-6 Luna

    Released Sep 22, 2026

    78/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.50
    • Context1.05M
  3. Thinking Machines

    Inkling Small

    Released Jul 30, 2026

    62/100
    • ECI150.2
    • Price$0.50 / $1.20
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

GPT-6 Luna is our pick

GPT-6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (69) and Inkling Small (62). It leads on capability and inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because GPT-6 Luna has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityGPT-6 LunaShared benchmarks: GPT-6 Luna 77.4% · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 69.2% · Inkling Small 61.0%
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 $0.175 · GPT-6 Luna $0.20 · Inkling Small $0.675 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-6 Luna and Inkling SmallGPT-6 Luna 1,050,000 · Inkling Small 1,048,576 · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-6 Luna and Inkling SmallDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Text · GPT-6 Luna: Text, Images, PDFs · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Inkling SmallPublishes downloadable weights (MIT and Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731GPT-6 LunaInkling Small
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%697761
Price25%868358
Inputs & features15%458070
Context window10%606161
Overall100%69/10078/10062/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GPT-6 Luna vs Inkling Small specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeekGPT-6 LunaOpenAIInkling SmallThinking Machines
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)154.5 (best)—150.2
ECI rank#32 of 148 (best)—#47 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions91.0% (best)90.5%88.5%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics57.5%79.0% (best)46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics94.4%98.9% (best)90.0%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions33.6%41.4% (best)19.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.14$0.10 (best)$0.50
Output$0.28 (best)$0.50$1.20
Cached input—$0.01—
Blended (3:1)$0.175 (best)$0.20$0.675
Long-context rateSame rateOver 272K: $0.20 / $0.75Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 48 providersOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 11 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens
Max output384,000 tokens128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenMITProprietaryOpenApache-2.0
API model ID—gpt-6-luna—
API providers49 (best)2411
ReleasedJul 31, 2026Sep 22, 2026Jul 30, 2026
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025May 18, 2026—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731$1.96
  • GPT-6 Luna$2.00
  • Inkling Small$7.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, GPT-6 Luna or Inkling Small?

GPT-6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (69) and Inkling Small (62). It leads on capability and inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because GPT-6 Luna has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, GPT-6 Luna or Inkling Small?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (median across 48 API providers). GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Inkling Small costs $0.50 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 versus $0.20 for GPT-6 Luna (1.1× as much) and $0.675 for Inkling Small (3.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified): GPT-6 Luna 77.4%, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 69.2% and Inkling Small 61.0%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 91.0%, GPT-6 Luna 90.5%, Inkling Small 88.5%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6 Luna 79.0%, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 57.5%, Inkling Small 46.3%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-6 Luna 98.9%, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 94.4%, Inkling Small 90.0%; SimpleQA Verified — GPT-6 Luna 41.4%, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 33.6%, Inkling Small 19.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, GPT-6 Luna and Inkling Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6 Luna leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna and Inkling Small have the largest context windows (1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 up to 384,000, GPT-6 Luna up to 128,000, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts text; GPT-6 Luna accepts text, images and PDFs; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio. GPT-6 Luna handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Inkling Small publishes its weights (MIT and Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; GPT-6 Luna is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-6 Luna is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 came out Jul 31, 2026; Inkling Small came out Jul 30, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 May 2025, GPT-6 Luna May 18, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.