DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Magistral Small
Too close to call on our weighted score (DeepSeek V3 0324 52, Magistral Small 49). The right pick depends on what you value most.
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3 0324
52/100- ECI135.9
- Price$0.275 / $1.12
- Context164K
Mistral AIMagistral Small
49/100- ECI133.1
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (DeepSeek V3 0324 52/100, Magistral Small 49/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V3 0324 for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityDeepSeek V3 0324Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 · Magistral Small 133.1
- Lowest priceDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3 0324 $0.486 · Magistral Small $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3 0324 163,840 · Magistral Small 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsDeepSeek V3 0324: Text · Magistral Small: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 59 | 56 |
| Price | 25% | 62 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 28 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 52/100 | 49/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek | Magistral SmallMistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 135.9 (best) | 133.1 |
| ECI rank | #128 of 165 (best) | #134 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 67.6% (best) | 56.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 37.8% (best) | 30.0% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.275 (best) | $0.50 |
| Output | $1.12 (best) | $1.50 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.486 (best) | $0.75 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 13 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 163,840 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 163,840 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 13 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Mar 24, 2025 | Jun 10, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek V3 0324$4.99
- Magistral Small$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek V3 0324 or Magistral Small?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (DeepSeek V3 0324 52/100, Magistral Small 49/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V3 0324 for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Magistral Small?
DeepSeek V3 0324 is cheaper at $0.275 input / $1.12 output per million tokens (median across 13 API providers). Magistral Small costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.486 per million tokens for DeepSeek V3 0324 versus $0.75 for Magistral Small (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
DeepSeek V3 0324 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 (#128 of 165) and Magistral Small 133.1 (#134 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (132.5–137.7 vs 129.4–134.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek V3 0324 67.6%, Magistral Small 56.1%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — DeepSeek V3 0324 37.8%, Magistral Small 30.0%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Magistral Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, DeepSeek V3 0324 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3 0324 has the largest context window at 163,840 tokens, against 131,072 for Magistral Small. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V3 0324 up to 163,840, Magistral Small up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek V3 0324 accepts text; Magistral Small accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Magistral Small is the newest, released Jun 10, 2025. DeepSeek V3 0324 came out Mar 24, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add QwQ 32BThree-way comparison
- DeepSeek V3 0324 vs QwQ 32BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 137.5
- DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · ECI 134.9
- DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.3
- Magistral Small vs GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · ECI 134.9
- Magistral Small vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.3
- Magistral Small vs DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek · ECI 132.3
