ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

DeepSeek-R1 vs Kimi K2 Instruct vs GPT-4.1

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-4.1 52, Kimi K2 Instruct 50, DeepSeek-R1 48). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek-R1

    Released Jan 20, 2025

    48/100
    • ECI138.8
    • Price$0.70 / $4.88
    • Context128K
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2 Instruct

    Released Jul 11, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI139.9
    • Price$0.57 / $2.30
    • Context131K
  3. OpenAI

    GPT-4.1

    Released Apr 14, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI136.7
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-4.1 52/100, Kimi K2 Instruct 50/100, DeepSeek-R1 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2 Instruct for raw capability and GPT-4.1 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityKimi K2 InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Kimi K2 Instruct 139.9 · DeepSeek-R1 138.8 · GPT-4.1 136.7
  • Lowest priceKimi K2 InstructKimi K2 Instruct $1.00 · DeepSeek-R1 $1.75 · GPT-4.1 $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-4.1GPT-4.1 1,047,576 · Kimi K2 Instruct 131,072 · DeepSeek-R1 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4.1DeepSeek-R1: Text · Kimi K2 Instruct: Text · GPT-4.1: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek-R1 and Kimi K2 InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Modified MIT)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek-R1Kimi K2 InstructGPT-4.1
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%636460
Price25%374823
Inputs & features15%352570
Context window10%242561
Overall100%48/10050/10052/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek-R1 vs Kimi K2 Instruct vs GPT-4.1 specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek-R1DeepSeekKimi K2 InstructMoonshot AIGPT-4.1OpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)138.8139.9 (best)136.7
ECI rank#119 of 165#112 of 165 (best)#125 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions71.7% (best)—66.9%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics——6.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics53.3% (best)—38.3%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues——48.5%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions——31.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.70$0.57 (best)$2.00
Output$4.88$2.30 (best)$8.00
Cached input——$0.50
Blended (3:1)$1.75$1.00 (best)$3.50
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 11 providersMedian of 11 providersOfficial OpenAI API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens1,047,576 tokens (best)
Max output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenModified MITProprietary
API model ID——gpt-4.1
API providers121131 (best)
ReleasedJan 20, 2025Jul 11, 2025Apr 14, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJul 2024—Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek-R1$16.76
  • Kimi K2 Instruct$10.30
  • GPT-4.1$36.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek-R1, Kimi K2 Instruct or GPT-4.1?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-4.1 52/100, Kimi K2 Instruct 50/100, DeepSeek-R1 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2 Instruct for raw capability and GPT-4.1 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1, Kimi K2 Instruct or GPT-4.1?

Kimi K2 Instruct is cheaper at $0.57 input / $2.30 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.70 input / $4.88 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers); GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.00 per million tokens for Kimi K2 Instruct versus $1.75 for DeepSeek-R1 (1.7× as much) and $3.50 for GPT-4.1 (3.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Kimi K2 Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Kimi K2 Instruct 139.9 (#112 of 165), DeepSeek-R1 138.8 (#119 of 165) and GPT-4.1 136.7 (#125 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (136.3–141.6 vs 136.5–140.2), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek-R1 and Kimi K2 Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Kimi K2 Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Kimi K2 Instruct and 128,000 for DeepSeek-R1. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek-R1 up to 32,768, Kimi K2 Instruct up to 32,768, GPT-4.1 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek-R1 accepts text; Kimi K2 Instruct accepts text; GPT-4.1 accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-4.1 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek-R1 and Kimi K2 Instruct publishes its weights (Modified MIT) and can be self-hosted; GPT-4.1 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K2 Instruct is the newest, released Jul 11, 2025. GPT-4.1 came out Apr 14, 2025; DeepSeek-R1 came out Jan 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek-R1 Jul 2024, GPT-4.1 Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.