DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 comes out ahead, 78 to 72 and 16 on our weighted score, though Gemini 2.0 Flash is 14% cheaper per token.
DeepSeekDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
16/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context131K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17
78/100- ECI133.8
- Price$0.12 / $0.48
- Context1.05M
- Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
72/100- ECI134.7
- Price$0.10 / $0.42
- Context1.05M
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Gemini 2.0 Flash (72) and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B (16). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini 2.0 FlashGemini 2.0 Flash $0.18 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 $0.21 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B unpriced
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.0 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 1,048,576 · Gemini 2.0 Flash 1,048,576 · DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.0 FlashDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: Text · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Gemini 2.0 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 | Gemini 2.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 10 | 90 | 80 |
| Context window | 40% | 25 | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 16/100 | 78/100 | 72/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BDeepSeek | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17Google | Gemini 2.0 FlashGoogle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 133.8 | 134.7 (best) |
| ECI rank | — | #132 of 165 | #130 of 165 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 64.1% | — | 64.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 55.6% (best) | — | 31.1% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $0.12 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | — | $0.48 | $0.42 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.21 | $0.18 (best) |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Median of 2 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | — | 2 | 2 |
| Released | Jan 20, 2025 | Jun 17, 2025 | Dec 11, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 | Jun 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B—
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17$2.16
- Gemini 2.0 Flash$1.84
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Gemini 2.0 Flash (72) and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B (16). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.42 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 costs $0.12 input / $0.48 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.18 per million tokens for Gemini 2.0 Flash versus $0.21 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 (1.2× as much). DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B has not been scored yet, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 has an ECI of 133.8 and Gemini 2.0 Flash has an ECI of 134.7.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.0 Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.0 Flash have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 131,072 for DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B up to 32,768, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 up to 65,536, Gemini 2.0 Flash up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B accepts text; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.0 Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 is the newest, released Jun 17, 2025. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B came out Jan 20, 2025; Gemini 2.0 Flash came out Dec 11, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 Jan 2025, Gemini 2.0 Flash Jun 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B vs QwQ 32BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 137.5
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B vs GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · ECI 134.9
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.3
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs Qwen3 30B A3BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 136.2
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.3
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview 06-17 vs Magistral SmallMistral AI · ECI 133.1
