ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

DeepSeek OCR 2 vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 50, GLM-5V-Turbo 49, DeepSeek OCR 2 32). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek OCR 2

    Released Jan 27, 2026

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.89 / $1.47
    • Context8K
  2. Google

    Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

    Released Apr 14, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context131K
  3. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5V-Turbo

    Released Apr 1, 2026

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.00
    • Context200K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 50/100, GLM-5V-Turbo 49/100, DeepSeek OCR 2 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek OCR 2 on price and GLM-5V-Turbo for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek OCR 2 $1.03 · GLM-5V-Turbo $1.90 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGLM-5V-TurboGLM-5V-Turbo 200,000 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and GLM-5V-TurboDeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video · GLM-5V-Turbo: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek OCR 2Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek OCR 2Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGLM-5V-Turbo
Price50%493637
Inputs & features30%259080
Context window20%02432
Overall100%32/10050/10049/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek OCR 2 vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs GLM-5V-Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeekGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogleGLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.89 (best)$1.00$1.20
Output$1.47 (best)$5.00$4.00
Cached input——$0.24
Blended (3:1)$1.03 (best)$2.00$1.90
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 1 providersOfficial Z.AI API
Limits
Context window8,192 tokens131,072 tokens200,000 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningNoYesYes
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryProprietary
API model ID——glm-5v-turbo
API providers2114 (best)
ReleasedJan 27, 2026Apr 14, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Jan 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek OCR 2$11.83
  • Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
  • GLM-5V-Turbo$20.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek OCR 2, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview or GLM-5V-Turbo?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 50/100, GLM-5V-Turbo 49/100, DeepSeek OCR 2 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek OCR 2 on price and GLM-5V-Turbo for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek OCR 2, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview or GLM-5V-Turbo?

DeepSeek OCR 2 is cheaper at $0.89 input / $1.47 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.03 per million tokens for DeepSeek OCR 2 versus $1.90 for GLM-5V-Turbo (1.8× as much) and $2.00 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (1.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet and GLM-5V-Turbo has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek OCR 2, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and GLM-5V-Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5V-Turbo has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536, GLM-5V-Turbo up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video; GLM-5V-Turbo accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek OCR 2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and GLM-5V-Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the newest, released Apr 14, 2026. GLM-5V-Turbo came out Apr 1, 2026; DeepSeek OCR 2 came out Jan 27, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.