ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Command R7B vs Llama-3.2-3B vs Pixtral 12B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Pixtral 12B 64, Command R7B 62, Llama-3.2-3B 49). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Cohere

    Command R7B

    Released Dec 2, 2024

    62/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.037 / $0.15
    • Context128K
  2. Meta

    Llama-3.2-3B

    Released Sep 25, 2024

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.335
    • Context131K
  3. Mistral AI

    Pixtral 12B

    Released Sep 1, 2024

    64/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Pixtral 12B 64/100, Command R7B 62/100, Llama-3.2-3B 49/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Command R7B on price and Llama-3.2-3B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceCommand R7BCommand R7B $0.066 · Pixtral 12B $0.15 · Llama-3.2-3B $0.159 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama-3.2-3BLlama-3.2-3B 131,072 · Command R7B 128,000 · Pixtral 12B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPixtral 12BCommand R7B: Text · Llama-3.2-3B: Text · Pixtral 12B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightCommand R7BLlama-3.2-3BPixtral 12B
Price50%1008889
Inputs & features30%25050
Context window20%242424
Overall100%62/10049/10064/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Command R7B vs Llama-3.2-3B vs Pixtral 12B specifications side by side
SpecificationCommand R7BCohereLlama-3.2-3BMetaPixtral 12BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.037 (best)$0.10$0.15
Output$0.15 (best)$0.335$0.15 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.066 (best)$0.159$0.15
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Cohere APIMedian of 3 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output4,000 tokens8,192 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenLlama 3.2 Community LicenseOpen
API model IDcommand-r7b-12-2024—pixtral-12b
API providers5 (best)34
ReleasedDec 2, 2024Sep 25, 2024Sep 1, 2024
Knowledge cutoffJun 1, 2024Dec 2023Sep 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Command R7B$0.675
  • Llama-3.2-3B$1.67
  • Pixtral 12B$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Command R7B, Llama-3.2-3B or Pixtral 12B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Pixtral 12B 64/100, Command R7B 62/100, Llama-3.2-3B 49/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Command R7B on price and Llama-3.2-3B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Command R7B, Llama-3.2-3B or Pixtral 12B?

Command R7B is cheaper at $0.037 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Pixtral 12B costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Llama-3.2-3B costs $0.10 input / $0.335 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.066 per million tokens for Command R7B versus $0.15 for Pixtral 12B (2.3× as much) and $0.159 for Llama-3.2-3B (2.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command R7B has not been scored yet, Llama-3.2-3B has not been scored yet and Pixtral 12B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command R7B, Llama-3.2-3B and Pixtral 12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Llama-3.2-3B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama-3.2-3B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Command R7B and 128,000 for Pixtral 12B. Maximum output per response: Command R7B up to 4,000, Llama-3.2-3B up to 8,192, Pixtral 12B up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Command R7B accepts text; Llama-3.2-3B accepts text; Pixtral 12B accepts text and images. Pixtral 12B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Llama 3.2 Community License), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Command R7B is the newest, released Dec 2, 2024. Llama-3.2-3B came out Sep 25, 2024; Pixtral 12B came out Sep 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Command R7B Jun 1, 2024, Llama-3.2-3B Dec 2023, Pixtral 12B Sep 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.