ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Command R7B Arabic vs DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct comes out ahead, 72 to 65 and 58 on our weighted score, though Command R7B Arabic is 18% cheaper per token.

  1. Cohere

    Command R7B Arabic

    Released Feb 27, 2025

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.037 / $0.15
    • Context128K
  2. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B

    Released May 29, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.06 / $0.09
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Microsoft

    Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

    Released Feb 26, 2025

    72/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.07 / $0.11
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is our pick

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Command R7B Arabic (65) and DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B (58). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceCommand R7B ArabicCommand R7B Arabic $0.066 · DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B $0.068 · Phi-4-multimodal-instruct $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B and Phi-4-multimodal-instructDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B 131,072 · Phi-4-multimodal-instruct 131,072 · Command R7B Arabic 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPhi-4-multimodal-instructCommand R7B Arabic: Text · DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B: Text · Phi-4-multimodal-instruct: Text, Images, Audio
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightCommand R7B ArabicDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BPhi-4-multimodal-instruct
Price50%10010098
Inputs & features30%351060
Context window20%242525
Overall100%65/10058/10072/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Command R7B Arabic vs DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationCommand R7B ArabicCohereDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BDeepSeekPhi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoft
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—9.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—43.9%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.037 (best)$0.06$0.07
Output$0.15$0.09 (best)$0.11
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.066 (best)$0.068$0.08
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Cohere APIMedian of 1 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)
Max output4,000 tokens32,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenMITOpenMIT
API model IDcommand-r7b-arabic-02-2025——
API providers111
ReleasedFeb 27, 2025May 29, 2025Feb 26, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJun 1, 2024—Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Command R7B Arabic$0.675
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B$0.78
  • Phi-4-multimodal-instruct$0.92
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Command R7B Arabic, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B or Phi-4-multimodal-instruct?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Command R7B Arabic (65) and DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B (58). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Command R7B Arabic, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B or Phi-4-multimodal-instruct?

Command R7B Arabic is cheaper at $0.037 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B costs $0.06 input / $0.09 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Phi-4-multimodal-instruct costs $0.07 input / $0.11 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.066 per million tokens for Command R7B Arabic versus $0.068 for DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B (1× as much) and $0.08 for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command R7B Arabic has not been scored yet, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has not been scored yet and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command R7B Arabic, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for Command R7B Arabic. Maximum output per response: Command R7B Arabic up to 4,000, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B up to 32,000, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Command R7B Arabic accepts text; DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B accepts text; Phi-4-multimodal-instruct accepts text, images and audio. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (MIT), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B is the newest, released May 29, 2025. Command R7B Arabic came out Feb 27, 2025; Phi-4-multimodal-instruct came out Feb 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Command R7B Arabic Jun 1, 2024, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.