Command A Plus vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Too close to call on our weighted score (MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 44, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 44, Command A Plus 35). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Cohere
Command A Plus
35/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
44/100- ECI—
- Price$1.90 / $8.00
- Context262K
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
44/100- ECI—
- Price$4.35 / $8.70
- Context1.05M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 44/100, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 44/100, Command A Plus 35/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed on price and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed $3.42 · Command A Plus $4.38 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $5.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 262,144 · Command A Plus 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A Plus: Text, Images · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed: Text, Images, Video · MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Command A Plus | Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 19 | 25 | 15 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 37 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 35/100 | 44/100 | 44/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.50 | $1.90 (best) | $4.35 |
| Output | $10.00 | $8.00 (best) | $8.70 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.036 |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.38 | $3.42 (best) | $5.44 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Cohere API | Median of 11 providers | Official Xiaomi API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Open |
| API model ID | command-a-plus-05-2026 | — | mimo-v2.6-pro-ultraspeed |
| API providers | 1 | 11 (best) | 9 |
| Released | May 20, 2026 | Jun 12, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 1, 2025 | Jan 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Command A Plus$45.00
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed$35.00
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed$60.90
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Command A Plus, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 44/100, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 44/100, Command A Plus 35/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed on price and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Command A Plus, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is cheaper at $1.90 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Command A Plus costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price); MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed costs $4.35 input / $8.70 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.42 per million tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed versus $4.38 for Command A Plus (1.3× as much) and $5.44 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command A Plus has not been scored yet, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command A Plus, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed and 128,000 for Command A Plus. Maximum output per response: Command A Plus up to 64,000, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed up to 262,144, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Command A Plus accepts text and images; Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts text, images and video; MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text, images, audio and video. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed came out Jun 12, 2026; Command A Plus came out May 20, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Plus Apr 1, 2025, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.