Command A Plus vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed comes out ahead, 44 to 35 on our weighted score, though Command A Plus is 20% cheaper per token.
CohereCommand A Plus
35/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
44/100- ECI—
- Price$4.35 / $8.70
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is our pick
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Command A Plus (35). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Command A Plus wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCommand A PlusCommand A Plus $4.38 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $5.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · Command A Plus 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A Plus: Text, Images · MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Command A Plus | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 19 | 15 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 35/100 | 44/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Command A PlusCohere | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.50 (best) | $4.35 |
| Output | $10.00 | $8.70 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.036 |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.38 (best) | $5.44 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Cohere API | Official Xiaomi API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | command-a-plus-05-2026 | mimo-v2.6-pro-ultraspeed |
| API providers | 1 | 9 (best) |
| Released | May 20, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 1, 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Command A Plus$45.00
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed$60.90
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Command A Plus or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Command A Plus (35). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Command A Plus wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Command A Plus or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
Command A Plus is cheaper at $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed costs $4.35 input / $8.70 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.38 per million tokens for Command A Plus versus $5.44 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Command A Plus has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command A Plus and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 128,000 for Command A Plus. Maximum output per response: Command A Plus up to 64,000, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Command A Plus accepts text and images; MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text, images, audio and video. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Command A Plus came out May 20, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Plus Apr 1, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedThree-way comparison
- Command A Plus vs Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI
- Command A Plus vs GPT-5.3 Codex SparkOpenAI
- Command A Plus vs ParetoUnbiased
- Command A Plus vs Qwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen 3.8 Max PrimeAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs ParetoUnbiased
