ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Codestral-22B-v0.1 vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs Vision Large

Vision Large comes out ahead, 84 to 10 and 0 on our weighted score, though Hermes 3 405B Instruct is 11× cheaper per token.

  1. Mistral AI

    Codestral-22B-v0.1

    Released May 29, 2024

    0/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context33K
  2. Nous Research

    Hermes 3 405B Instruct

    Released Aug 16, 2024

    10/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $1.00
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Vispark

    Vision Large

    Released May 15, 2024

    84/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$7.37 / $22.11
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Vision Large is our pick

Vision Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Hermes 3 405B Instruct (10) and Codestral-22B-v0.1 (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceHermes 3 405B InstructHermes 3 405B Instruct $1.00 · Vision Large $11.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Codestral-22B-v0.1 unpriced
  • Longest contextVision LargeVision Large 1,000,000 · Hermes 3 405B Instruct 131,072 · Codestral-22B-v0.1 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsVision LargeCodestral-22B-v0.1: Text · Hermes 3 405B Instruct: Text · Vision Large: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingCodestral-22B-v0.1 and Hermes 3 405B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Mistral AI Non-Production License)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightCodestral-22B-v0.1Hermes 3 405B InstructVision Large
Inputs & features60%00100
Context window40%02560
Overall100%0/10010/10084/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Codestral-22B-v0.1 vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs Vision Large specifications side by side
SpecificationCodestral-22B-v0.1Mistral AIHermes 3 405B InstructNous ResearchVision LargeVispark
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input—$1.00 (best)$7.37
Output—$1.00 (best)$22.11
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)—$1.00 (best)$11.05
Long-context rate—Same rateSame rate
Price source—Median of 5 providersOfficial Vispark API
Limits
Context window32,768 tokens131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens16,384 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingNoNoYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenMistral AI Non-Production LicenseOpenProprietary
API model ID——vispark/vision-large
API providers—5 (best)1
ReleasedMay 29, 2024Aug 16, 2024May 15, 2024
Knowledge cutoff—Dec 31, 2023—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Codestral-22B-v0.1—
  • Hermes 3 405B Instruct$12.00
  • Vision Large$117.92
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Codestral-22B-v0.1, Hermes 3 405B Instruct or Vision Large?

Vision Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Hermes 3 405B Instruct (10) and Codestral-22B-v0.1 (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Codestral-22B-v0.1, Hermes 3 405B Instruct or Vision Large?

Hermes 3 405B Instruct is cheaper at $1.00 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Vision Large costs $7.37 input / $22.11 output per million tokens (official Vispark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.00 per million tokens for Hermes 3 405B Instruct versus $11.05 for Vision Large (11× as much). Codestral-22B-v0.1 has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Codestral-22B-v0.1 has not been scored yet, Hermes 3 405B Instruct has not been scored yet and Vision Large has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Codestral-22B-v0.1, Hermes 3 405B Instruct and Vision Large yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Codestral-22B-v0.1 and Hermes 3 405B Instruct does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Vision Large has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Hermes 3 405B Instruct and 32,768 for Codestral-22B-v0.1. Maximum output per response: Codestral-22B-v0.1 up to 8,192, Hermes 3 405B Instruct up to 16,384, Vision Large up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Codestral-22B-v0.1 accepts text; Hermes 3 405B Instruct accepts text; Vision Large accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Vision Large handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Codestral-22B-v0.1 and Hermes 3 405B Instruct publishes its weights (Mistral AI Non-Production License) and can be self-hosted; Vision Large is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Hermes 3 405B Instruct is the newest, released Aug 16, 2024. Codestral-22B-v0.1 came out May 29, 2024; Vision Large came out May 15, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Hermes 3 405B Instruct Dec 31, 2023.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.