Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro comes out ahead, 69 to 54 and 50 on our weighted score, though Ling 3.1 Flash is 17% cheaper per token.
Reflection AIBeam 1.0 501B A23B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.00
- Context1.05M
inclusionAILing 3.1 Flash
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $0.90
- Context262K
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Pro
69/100- ECI—
- Price$0.435 / $0.87
- Context1.05M
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is our pick
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B (54) and Ling 3.1 Flash (50). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLing 3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash $0.45 · Beam 1.0 501B A23B $0.475 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.544 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextBeam 1.0 501B A23B and MiMo-V2.6-ProBeam 1.0 501B A23B 1,048,576 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1,048,576 · Ling 3.1 Flash 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-ProBeam 1.0 501B A23B: Text · Ling 3.1 Flash: Text · MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Ling 3.1 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 62 | 64 | 60 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 | 90 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 37 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 50/100 | 69/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection AI | Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAI | MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.30 (best) | $0.30 (best) | $0.435 |
| Output | $1.00 | $0.90 | $0.87 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.0036 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.475 | $0.45 (best) | $0.544 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 7 providers | Median of 5 providers | Official Xiaomi API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenApache-2.0 | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | mimo-v2.6-pro |
| API providers | 12 | 7 | 21 (best) |
| Released | Oct 5, 2026 | Sep 29, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 30, 2026 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B$5.00
- Ling 3.1 Flash$4.80
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro$6.09
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Beam 1.0 501B A23B, Ling 3.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B (54) and Ling 3.1 Flash (50). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B, Ling 3.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper at $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.30 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (median across 7 API providers); MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.45 per million tokens for Ling 3.1 Flash versus $0.475 for Beam 1.0 501B A23B (1.1× as much) and $0.544 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Beam 1.0 501B A23B has not been scored yet, Ling 3.1 Flash has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Beam 1.0 501B A23B, Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 262,144 for Ling 3.1 Flash. Maximum output per response: Beam 1.0 501B A23B up to 131,072, Ling 3.1 Flash up to 32,768, MiMo-V2.6-Pro up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts text; Ling 3.1 Flash accepts text; MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts text, images, audio and video. MiMo-V2.6-Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is the newest, released Oct 5, 2026. Ling 3.1 Flash came out Sep 29, 2026; MiMo-V2.6-Pro came out Sep 22, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Beam 1.0 501B A23B Jun 30, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Perceptron Mk1.5Perceptron
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat)
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Perceptron Mk1.5Perceptron
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Perceptron Mk1.5Perceptron
